The statement is false. Unfortunately, evidence that actively managed funds can consistently outperform their relevant index is difficult to find. It's even more challenging for an individual investor to identify which actively managed fund will outperform the index in a given year.
Yes, you may be able to beat the market, but with investment fees, taxes, and human emotion working against you, you're more likely to do so through luck than skill. If you can merely match the S&P 500, minus a small fee, you'll be doing better than most investors.
Mutual funds are actively managed by an investment professional, while index funds are more passive. Mutual funds come with much higher fees than index funds, which can cut into your potential gains.
To know more about Mutual funds here
brainly.com/question/13247161
#SPJ4
Answer:
Tendency to engage in charity is strongest for religious individuals were religious behavior is a matter of personal choice.
Explanation:
A religious individual
This is often refered to as someone who tries in every possible way to live his or her life in accordance with his or her faith. Those who regularly engages in religious activities is termed "religious".
Religion
This is often known as an organized and collective belief or faith system.
Intrinsic religiosity
This kind of religiosity deals with the fact that it is an individual's primary motive in life and it is the driving force in their life while Extrinsic religiosity is religiosity motivated by external, non-religious rewards.
Helping is the act of rendering assistance to fellow human being especially those of the same faith.
Religion is not enforced but mostly a matter of personal choice. One can decide to be in it or not. Religious people most times are actively involved in charity so as to render help,draw people to their faith or make the world a better place.
Limestone is one.........
France, England, Spain and either Sweden or Netherlands. Both did so either is ok.
<span>
<span>A recent trend has intergovernmental relations has been to pass down, mainly, the division of clear lines of responsibilities of each country. It has opened up to many different dimension that might concern each of them. A divided model of federalism in which the government would be in charge of making the laws and their implementation.</span></span>
