The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Different cultures respond ethically, morally, and politically to the pressures of modern industrial management in that they try to protect and maintain its own traditions and customs despite globalization and the continuing demand of corporation to produce more and more, not taking into consideration the human factor, the damage to the environment, and the respect for other cultures idiosyncracies.
It seems that modern industrial management is only focused on producing more results; more income through the selling of products and services. But they try to do this at all costs. Not considering people's way of thinking, belief systems, local history and traditions, and the respect of their own customs.
That is why most of the time multinational companies are not so well accepted in other countries. They created jobs, although most of the time are workers low paid jobs with minimum benefits. Some of these companies enter the country with fiscal privileges and pay minimum taxes and does not take care of the environment, wasting many natural resources that are much needed by the local people.
Regulations uphold business activity laws
Public Safety Regulations put into practice the will of federal and state legislatures to make workplaces safer for the workers. Regulations put the minute into practice, like headphone requirements in noisy workplaces.
Answer:
Explanation:
While the President customarily delegates supreme command of the forces in active service, there is no constitutional reason why he should do so, and he has been known to resolve personally important questions of military policy. Lincoln early in 1862 issued orders for a general advance in the hopes of stimulating McClellan to action; Wilson in 1918 settled the question of an independent American command on the Western Front; Truman in 1945 ordered that the bomb be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.206 As against an enemy in the field, the President possesses all the powers which are accorded by international law to any supreme commander. “He may invade the hostile country, and subject it to the sovereignty and authority of the United States.”207 In the absence of attempts by Congress to limit his power, he may establish and prescribe the jurisdiction and procedure of military commissions, and of tribunals in the nature of such commissions, in territory occupied by Armed Forces of the United States, and his authority to do this sometimes survives cessation of hostilities.208 He may employ secret agents to enter the enemy’s lines and obtain information as to its strength, resources, and movements.209 He may, at least with the assent of Congress, authorize commercial intercourse with the enemy.210 He may also requisition property and compel services from American citizens and friendly aliens who are situated within the theater of military operations when necessity requires, thereby incurring for the United States the obligation to render “just compensation.”211 By the same warrant, he may bring hostilities to a conclusion by arranging an armistice, stipulating conditions that may determine to a great extent the ensuing peace.212 He may not, however, effect a permanent acquisition of territory,213 though he may govern recently acquired territory until Congress sets up a more permanent regime.214
<span>You would use existing case law to attempt to prove the existence or nonexistent of contractual intent. Some major cases that a person could draw supporting evidence are:
Lumbreras v Rocha
2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 97 (13th Dist. 2012)
All Star Championship Racing, Inc. v. O'reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34951 (C.D. Ill. 2012)</span>
