Step-by-step explanation:
so therefore mark jogged 2 36/70km more than his sister
Answer:
isn't it undefined, since the line would go straight up and down?
Using the slope formula the answer would be 1-(-1)/(-1)-6. The slope would be 2/-7. It would be a negative slope.
C - 7.6 = -4
c = -4 + 7.6
c = 3.6
Answer:
Null Hypothesis: H_0: \mu_A =\mu _B or \mu_A -\mu _B=0
Alternate Hypothesis: H_1: \mu_A >\mu _B or \mu_A -\mu _B>0
Here to test Fertilizer A height is greater than Fertilizer B
Two Sample T Test:
t=\frac{X_1-X_2}{\sqrt{S_p^2(1/n_1+1/n_2)}}
Where S_p^2=\frac{(n_1-1)S_1^2+(n_2-1)S_2^2}{n_1+n_2-2}
S_p^2=\frac{(14)0.25^2+(12)0.2^2}{15+13-2}= 0.0521154
t=\frac{12.92-12.63}{\sqrt{0.0521154(1/15+1/13)}}= 3.3524
P value for Test Statistic of P(3.3524,26) = 0.0012
df = n1+n2-2 = 26
Critical value of P : t_{0.025,26}=2.05553
We can conclude that Test statistic is significant. Sufficient evidence to prove that we can Reject Null hypothesis and can say Fertilizer A is greater than Fertilizer B.