The missing justification in Julia's angle proof is; Corresponding Angles Theorem
<h3>What is the angle theorem used?</h3>
We know that m∠AGE ≅ m∠HGB because they have congruent angles and are vertical angles.
Similarly, m∠HGB ≅ m∠CHE are alternate interior angles because two congruent angles on the inner side of the parallel lines are formed by a transversal.
In the diagram, m∠AGE ≅ m∠CHE would have to be corresponding Angles Theorem because parallel lines cut by a transversal would create congruent corresponding angles. That means a pair of angles on the same side of one of two lines that is cut by a transversal and on the same side of the transversal.
Read more about Angle theorem at; brainly.com/question/24839702
#SPJ1
Answer:
3:9 u can reduce it again to 1:3
Step-by-step explanation:
We have,
l =5ft
b=2ft
h=3ft
v = (l*b*h)
v = (5*2*3)ft
v = (30)ft
.•. v = 30ft
Hey there!
First, we will do the subtraction with the two like terms on the left. I know they're like terms because although they have different coefficients, they have the same variable.
We have:
2n=4
Divide both sides by 3 to get:
n = 2
Hope this helps!
39393939/5555 = 7091.61 so each gets 7091 carrots.
There will be 3434 carrots left over
