Answer:
C) Illusory
Explanation:
More than an illusory contract (which means an unreasonable and non-enforceable contract), this is an unconscionable contract that no court would enforce.
This contract is so one sided that it damages the other party. The duties in clued in this contact are not enforceable because no person should be forced to do all those things just because the other party has more bargaining power.
Out of the 5 possible options the illusory contract is the only possible choice. Illusory contracts are also non-enforceable since only one side provides real consideration.
The argument above is a deductive reasoning. A deductive reasoning draws a conclusion from a series of premises that are held to be true. The argument also employs no informal fallacy. The confusion lies though on the first premise if it is true.
I believe your answer is B
A public good is a product or service that one consumer cannot present another consumer from using, and is accessible without payment
Once every 10 years search it up if I am wrong
Answer:
Option A, “the substitution effect dominates the income effect” is correct.
Explanation:
If the real wage increases then the opportunity cost for leisure will also increase. Therefore, an increase in real wages and a rise in the opportunity cost of leisure induce labor to supply more workforce or labor force. This is known as the substitution effect. Moreover, when this substitution effect is greater than the income effect then the supply curve for labor is upward sloping.
