I hope this answers your question..
The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment. The majority noted that freedom of speech protects actions that society may find very offensive, but society's outrage alone is not justification for suppressing free speech.
In particular, the majority noted that the Texas law discriminated upon viewpoint, i.e., although the law punished actions, such as flag burning, that might arouse anger in others, it specifically exempted from prosecution actions that were respectful of venerated objects, e.g., burning and burying a worn-out flag. The majority said that the government could not discriminate in this manner based solely upon viewpoint.
Hey, there are three syllables in the word "Jeopardized."
The word Jeopardized broken down: jeop-ard-ized.
What do you need help with?
50 rupees are nothing to buy anything
last two weeks and I am just back to life with a man was a breif of the art of a woe of the art of a woe of the art of a woe of the art of a woe
therefore we will not have to pay the rent until we are back in the air water is a white one in which was early in and heard of a crush Age at a higher rate of a crush Age with a black leggings then a black bag will not fit your hair
yh I have to be careful to be honest and worry and worry and worry and worry and worry and I am just back from a good time stopped working
