Explanation:
The European nations were able to conquer large sections of Africa in those times because they had more advanced military technology. Europeans easily adapted to African climate and topography. But Also, Europe, has more advances in technology in warfare, transportations. Also their governments are strong and stable due to ones careful rule.
But the real reason for European dominant is because they really and I mean really focus on their militaristic aspect as which they relied on for stability, conquest, and glory because thousands of years, Kings and some Queens are tought the ways of war and how war can give more than just territory and as a matter of fact Kings had trained themselves in Europe for milania, so not just did Kings evolve but the technology to fight among themselves were drastically improved as well.
This is all the information I have sadly.
Answer:
It created conflict between the two, arguing over many things, such as slavery.
Explanation:
Imperialism occurs when a state government tries to exert power over a territory that does not belong to the country. This can happen directly, by territorial acquisition, or indirectly, by economic or political influence.
The United States should not engage in imperialism, because the benefits are always one-sided. While the U. S. might benefit, the other country is unlikley to do so. Moreover, if the reason for taking over the territory is out of humanitarian concern, there are many measures that the government can take before resorting to imperialism.
The correct matches are the following.
Next to each short event or account, write either historical or unhistorical.
a. George Washington never told a lie. Historical.
b. Hildegard of Bingen had visions from god. Historical.
c. Hildegard of Bingen wrote about visions from god. Historical.
d. Native African people are not capable of constructing with stone. Unhistorical.
e. Romans built roads. Historical.
When we refer to the term historical, we mean that the statement is based on historical events. So we can search on primary or secondary sources to find the topic and the argument. Then historical means it is based on historical facts that can be supported. On the contrary, the term unhistorical means that there is no historic support to the claim, and probably the statement is only based on oral tradition, suppositions, or deductions.
