Answer:
The correct answer is B. The presence of an overbearing guardian distinguishes routine activity theory from situational crime prevention.
Explanation:
Situational crime prevention is a criminal theory that establishes that all crime can be stopped before its development if the situations or contextual conditions that favor its development are modified.
Thus, the presence of a policeman in a certain place, for example, modifies the context for the criminal, who knows that he will not be able to carry out his crime in the place where this policeman is. Thus, the presence of a guard limits the development of the crime, by modifying the context in which the criminal seeks to develop his activity.
Answer:
Say you don't want to speak till you get a lawyer. That they are wrong you are gonna sue them for wrongful prosuction. Then when you get your lawyer state you alibia and how your not guilty.
Explanation:
Answer:
Arizona v. Gant
Explanation:
Arizona v. Gant (2009), was a USA Supreme Court choice stating that the 4th Amendment to the USA Constitution requires law implementation officials to exhibit a real and proceeding with danger to their wellbeing presented by an arrestee, or a need to protect proof identified with the wrongdoing of capture from altering by the arrestee, so as to legitimize a warrantless vehicular pursuit episode to capture directed after the vehicle's ongoing tenants have been captured and made sure about.
A balance between individual rights and social control is possible through a set of democratic and participatory laws.
<h3>What are individual rights?</h3>
Individual rights is a term that refers to the freedoms and rights that an individual has from the moment he is born. Among these rights are the right to move freely, the right to think and express oneself freely, among others.
<h3>What is control and authority?</h3>
Control and authority are terms that refer to the control that the state has over individuals so that society is in harmony and the lives of citizens are not disturbed.
In accordance with the above, it can be inferred that it is possible that there is a balance between these two concepts. In fact, in most democratic states today, individual rights allow the control and legitimate authority of the state.
Learn more about individual rights in: brainly.com/question/619133
#SPJ1
