1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ehidna [41]
2 years ago
8

This lesson reviewed how Supreme Court justices, as well as other

Law
1 answer:
grigory [225]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

No, I do not agree. Judges should not be appointed for life. Sometimes the judges might have terible opinions and may be biased.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
A safe following distance for a car is?
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

First option

1 Car length for every 10mph.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the presidential election
Natalka [10]

Answer:

The election of the president and the vice president of the United States is an indirect election in which citizens of the United States who are registered to vote in one of the fifty U.S. states or in Washington, D.C., cast ballots not directly for those offices, but instead for members of the Electoral College.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Joan is a white-collar offender. She has been convicted of embezzlement and given a prison sentence. In terms of security levels
Katen [24]

Answer: C

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
1.) If I Can’t Have You. Bertha shot and ki((ed her husband and his lover after discovering them having passion in his car. When
Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

You are the trial judge at the sentencing hearing. If you wish, you can rely on the suppressed confession for a sentence enhancement, in effect imposing the same sentence Bertha would have received for second-degree murder. Should you do so? Why or why not?

b. If you were on the appellate court reviewing Bertha’s sentence imposed as described in (a), would you rule that this sentence is fair?

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the case of ________, the Supreme Court gave the lower courts some discretion over how they applied the test for qualified im
asambeis [7]

Answer:

Pearson v. Callahan

Explanation:

This was a case that was decided by the United States which would deal with the doctrine of qualified immunity.

Hope this Helps!

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Mr pickles butt hole
    7·1 answer
  • If the free speech aspect of the First Amendment were up for ratification today,do you think it would pass in the same form as i
    6·1 answer
  • Why were the Articles of Confederation an unrealistic plan of government
    15·1 answer
  • Can i drive to school and work with my learners permit? florida
    7·1 answer
  • Write down formula of power​
    7·2 answers
  • If u put 1 apple in 1 pill of 12 oranges how many apples would u divide to make them even?
    7·2 answers
  • The specific portion of the US Constitution which deals with the Federal Court System is _______.
    12·1 answer
  • A veteran wants to buy a home for which the owners will accept no less than $120,000. The Certificate of Reasonable Value indica
    15·1 answer
  • Qué clasificaciones conoce sobre empleo y desempleo? Relate algún ejemplo.
    12·1 answer
  • There is no evidence that giving_____to your children makes them hyperactive.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!