Answer:
Your answer should be 3, hope this helps!
Answer:
(a) No the conclusion is not justified.
b. No
c. Two defective circuits in the sample
Step-by-step explanation:
Ans: (a) No the conclusion is not justified. What is important is the percentage population of defectives;
the sample proportion is only an approximation. The population proportion
for the new process may be more than or less than that of the old process. We can decide to pick two hundred samples and discover that the number of defects is greater than the previous process
(b)
.For the defectives, the population proportion for the new process may be 0.12 or more,
although the sample of defectives is just 11 out of 100
(c) Two defective circuits in the sample. This is because the probability of having two defects from the 100n samples is less than having 11 defects
Answer:
95.03 in
Step-by-step explanation:
A= πr2=π·5.52≈95.03318
Answer:
c
Step-by-step explanation:
hopefully this helps :)
Cost and benefit analysis is where you compare the benefit you receive to the cost you pay.
For example: going to a movie costs $30. The benefit is seeing the movie you’ve been wanting to see. If you go to the movie you analyzed that the benefit is greater than the cost. If you stayed home, you analyzed that the cost is greater than the benefit.
