The fact that people who watch a lot of violent TV are also more likely to be aggressive does not in itself proof a cause-effect relationship. That is, there is no evidence that one situation is a cause and the other one is a consequence (causation). It only proves that both characteristics are present together (correlation).
This could be a case of “spurious correlation,” which implies that two characteristics are often present together because there is a third factor that influences both of them.
For example, if we assume that this case refers to minors, it could be that minors who watch a lot of violent TV are neglected by their parents. Additionally, it could be that children who behave aggressively are also neglected by their parents. If that were the case, then being neglected would be a more likely predictor of violent behaviour, as opposed to watching violent TV.
In order to make sure there is a cause-effect relationship, we would need to perform an experiment where all other factors are controlled.
<em><u>The people opposed to a bill of rights didn't like the idea of putting limits on powers the government didn't even have. They feared future leaders could twist that around and use it against the people. The terms of the Constitution said that it would become effective after just nine states ratified it.</u></em>
Answer:
Health and hospitals.
Explanation:
Health and hospital budget are given special attention in any country. If the country is poor its health budget is given maximum fund to ensure good health care facilities for the citizens. Cities and States spend about same amount on health and hospitals budget to ensure the health care facility availability in the country and to deal with any pandemic diseases.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
An adversary system is a legal system used in the common law countries where two advocates represent their parties' case or position before an impartial person or group of people
The answer to this question is a
