Answer: The first experiment has M probabilities, and the second has I(m) outcomes, that depends on the result of the first.
And lets call m to the result of the first experiment.
If the outcome of the first experiment is 1, then the second experiment has 1 possible outcome.
If the outcome of the first experiment is 2, then the second experiment has 2 possibles outcomes.
If the outcome of the first experiment is M, then the second experiment has M possibles outcomes.
And so on.
So the total number of combinations C is the sum of all the cases, where we exami
1 outcome for m = 1
+
2 outcomes for m=2
+
.
.
.
+
M outcomes for m = M
C = 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 +...´+M
Complete the recursive formula of the geometric sequence 16\,,\,3.2\,,\,0.64\,,\,0.128,...16,3.2,0.64,0.128,
Nastasia [14]
Answer:
for all n>0, 
Step-by-step explanation:
Let 
be the sequence described.
A geometric sequence has the following property: there exists some r (the ratio of the sequence) such that 
forr all n>0.
To find r, note that
Similarly
Thus 
for all n>0, and
9514 1404 393
Answer:
r = 0
r = -7
Step-by-step explanation:
There is no x in the equation, hence there are no x-intercepts.
__
If we assume you want the values of r that satisfy the equation, the zero product property tells you they will be the values that make the factors zero.
The factors are r and (r+7).
The factor r is zero when ...
r = 0
The factor (r+7) is zero when ...
r +7 = 0 ⇒ r = -7
The "x-intercepts" are r=0 and r=-7.
4(x+2)+2=14
4x+8+2=14
4x+10=14
Subtract 10 from both sides
4x=4
Divide by 4 on both sides
x=1
3,000 in.
(4 x 10) + (7.5 x 10) = 3000
The dimensions on the sketch are 10 times less than the actual rug.
40 in., 7.5 in.
The drawing lengths are ten times more, so you just multiply the dimensions by 10, and then multiply the product you find out to find the actual area of the rug.
