Answer:
(European) goldsmiths
Explanation:
European goldsmiths (Italian goldsmiths were the first) formulated a principle that only 5% of deposits were needed in reserve at any particular time, therefore they could lend 95% of the gold they held in deposit.
Goldsmiths would rent space in their vaults that allowed other people to keep their gold in a safe place. That led to transactions were notes indicating the amount of gold deposited would be traded instead of trading gold itself.
Eventually goldsmiths discovered that they could trade (lend) more money than the amount of gold they held in deposits, inventing fractional reserve banking.
The credit balance in cash short and over at the end of an accounting period is reported as an expense on the income statement.
Income is the consumption and savings opportunity that a business captures within a specific time frame, usually expressed in money. Income is difficult to define conceptually and definitions vary by region.
The definition of income is the amount of money received by an individual, group or business during a specified period. An example income is an annual salary of $70,000.
Income is money received by an individual or business in return for providing work, producing goods or services, or investing capital. While individuals usually earn their income through wages or salaries, businesses generate income from the sale of goods or services that exceed their production costs.
Learn more about income here:brainly.com/question/25745683
#SPJ4
Answer:
A Subjective performance evaluation is more feasible when evaluating jobs that cannot easily be evaluated by numbers, in finding problems such as ethical errors that objective evaluation cannot identify and in identifying the rate of achievement of work goals that cannot be recorded in an objective evaluation.
Explanation:
Though Objective evaluation has been the more favored form of evaluation for valid reasons, there are still situations where subjective performance evaluation does a better job in the workplace.
Some jobs for example, the job of an attorney, cannot easily be objectively evaluated. In this situation, it falls on the employer to evaluate the performance of the employee by using measurements like team play, professionalism and client service.
In objective analysis, some ethical approaches are overlooked and the achievement of the set goal is the major criterion for ratings. This affords employees the opportunity to use unethical means to achieve set targets and the objective performance evaluation skips it, leaving them safe and with high ratings. In subjective performance ratings however, the employer having the power to rate employers, could expose these unethical behaviors faster and actions, taken on them.
In the workplace, certain goals are set in overall goals, as a method to achieving the overall set target. In an objective performance rating, an employee could bypass these and still appear to have achieved the overall goal. An objective evaluation will miss this but a subjective evaluation could pick this out and make rating each employee based on these soft goals and overall goal achievable.
Answer:
Before starting her import business, Elena should try to gather relevant information from companies that import goods, and if possible information about companies that import African goods.
Explanation:
Elena might be right about American consumers liking African products, but if importing those goods is too difficult, or is subject to several trade barriers, or some other issues, then Elena might have to reconsider her idea. Sometimes no matter how good a business idea is, if it is impractical to carry out, then t is useless.
Im sorry , i don’t understand .
but have a good day <33
