Answer:
Correct option is B.
The net benefit of the activity you would have chosen if you had not taken the course
Explanation:
Your opportunity cost of taking this course is <u>the net benefit of the activity you would have chosen if you had not taken the course
</u>
Opportunity cost is what you must sacrifice when you choose an activity. By taking this course, you are sacrificing the benefit you could have obtained from the activity you would have chosen if you had not taken the course.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
It is 'Incremental cost allocation method' that ranks the individual users of a cost object in order of users most responsible for a common cost (the most responsible will be primary user) and then uses these rankings to allocate the costs among the users (incremental users).
Stand-alone cost allocation method allocates cost proportionately among all users based on a basis which relates to each users proportion of the total. For example the basis could be proportion of sales of responsibility centers to total sales of organization.
Answer:
$340,000
Explanation:
A sunk cost is a cost that has already been incurred and cannot be affected by any decision that someone makes. E.g. once you pay an expense like rent, the cost will not be recovered or altered by any decision that you make. Sunk costs is simply money that has been spent and cannot be recovered.
Answer:
Total Claim = $2416
Explanation:
The coverage on the currency = $250
The coverage on the jewelry = $1000
The limit on the gold, pewter, and silver = $2500
The amount that is stolen:
The amount of cash = $270
The worth of jewelry = $1734
Pewterware = $1666
The miximum coverage = 250 + 1000 + 2500 = $3750
Actual loss = 270 + 1734 + 1666 = $3670
Reimbursement amount = 250 + 1000 + 1666 = $2916
Total Claim = Total Amount Covered – Deductible
Total Claim = $2916 - $500 = $2416
Answer : coefficient of determination.
In the regression analysis results on MS excel the SSR/ SS total is called as " coefficient of determination"
