It lacked a Bill of Rights to protect individual freedoms. Hope this helps!
Answer:
In some cases (for example, that of the Talensi), an independent community or chiefdom was aware that others like it shared the same culture and social structure, and there were occasional common rituals that brought independent communities together. In other cases (for example, the Dagaba), political and cultural boundaries were not sharp, and there was no sense that an ethnic group included some communities and excluded others, although shifting distinctions were made based on various cultural traits. In the case of the Dagaba, the most important or recurrent of these distinctions seemed to be, and in the mid-twentieth century continued to be, whether inheritance was exclusively determined in the patrilineal line or, at least in part, followed the matrilineal line.
Explanation:
I hope this helps :)
Answer:
A ." one-size fits all" approach should be maintained
Explanation:
When considering special needs acceptance guidelines, the one size fits all approach should not included because it is an illustration that a thing would fill in all instances and those with special needs may not be able to find the exact thing they are looking for if we still use the principle. All the other items in the choices can be done
