Answer: The person violated the expectations of the audience about the purpose of the occasion
.
Explanation:
Politics is a somewhat controversial issue and should be named carefully so as not to offend other people. In several cases, it has been seen how certain celebrities talk about their candidate (which is their right) in different scenarios. The Academy Awards, called Los Oscars, is the most important night in Hollywood, it is a time where everyone wants to enjoy and winners celebrate. At the moment of a person going to receive its prize, she must be careful with the type of words she uses or the idea in general that she expresses in its speech since it may be that many people do not take it in the best way.
Within the regulations established in the label and protocol, the importance of not touching issues that may be controversial is highlighted, since they may ruin the evening or the moment to others, some of these issues may be religion or politics. While it is true that the person who received the Oscar has the right to express his opinion, political preferences should not be expressed in all kinds of scenarios because you have to have respect for others and that the Oscars do not have that approach.
Anyone who goes to awards and has the opportunity to express their opinion should be careful about what they say since in each situation some issues can be talked about and not.
<span>The answer is D. Long-term certificate of deposit
From all types of investment that available in the market today, Certificate of deposit is regarded as one of the safest because your investment is insured by </span><span>The FDIC (Federal </span>Deposit<span> Insurance Corporation).
But as a nature of its safe investment , Certificate of deposit only provide small return that you could take when it reach its maturation date.</span>
Human rights in the United States comprise a series of rights which are legally protected by the Constitution of the United States, including the amendments,[2][3] state constitutions, conferred by treaty, and enacted legislatively through Congress, state legislatures, and state referenda and citizen's initiatives. Federal courts in the United States have jurisdiction over international human rights laws as a federal question, arising under international law, which is part of the law of the United States.[4]
The human rights record of the United States of America is a complicated matter; first and foremost the Federal Government of the United States has, through a ratified constitution and amendments thereof, guaranteed unalienable rights to citizens of the country, and also to some degree, non-citizens. However, the historical evolution of these rights must be considered as well, as the periphery of the population of the United States who had access to these rights has expanded over time, and in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights has not fully expanded complete rights to all human beings within its borders as compared to the international standard set by the United Nations General Assembly, because of social and political issues that stem from the history of the United States.
Answer:
Probubaly Regretted For Creating Them...
"During the gold rush, white miners used nativism and racism to justify ..." This violence was reflected in the document Compromise of 1850. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is a
Compromise of 1850?</h3>
Generally, the Compromise of the 1850 document is simply defined as Five measures, known as the Compromise of 1850, was presented to the U.S. Congress in an effort to end the conflict over expanding slavery into newly acquired territory.
In conclusion, A document called the Compromise of 1850 highlighted the violence that occurred during the gold rush as white miners exploited nativism and racism to excuse their actions.
Read more about the document
brainly.com/question/4526851
#SPJ1
