Which best describes the composition of transformations that maps JKLM to PQRS?

Please help it is one question please please and give explanation!!

Dafna1 [17]

It is a i think sorry if wrong

5 0

3 years ago

Christopher just found beautiful yarn for 20% off at his favorite yarn store. He can make one scarf from 2/3 of a ball of yarn.

bija089 [108]

Christopher would be able to make 18 scarves.

To solve this problem, we just need to divide 12 by 2/3. To divide 12 by 2/3, we just multiply 12 by 3/2.

This will give us 36 over 2 or just 18.

3 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP!!

olga_2 [115]

The value of a = 2.17 and b = 1.95.

<h3>What is regression line?</h3>

A regression line is a graphic representation of the regression equation expressing the hypothesized relationship between an outcome or dependent variable and one or more predictors or independent variables;

y= $2.01*1.93^{x}$

Correlation:

r=0.964

R-squared:

r²=0.9292

Hence, value of a and b is 2.17 and 1.95.

learn more about regression line here:

brainly.com/question/11340674

#SPJ1

8 0

2 years ago

Prove that the recurring decimal 0.39 = 13/33

Tcecarenko [31]

$x=0.\overline{39}\\100x=39.\overline{39}\\
100x-x=39.\overline{39}-0.\overline{39}\\
99x=39\\
x=\dfrac{39}{99}=\dfrac{13}{33}
$

8 0

3 years ago

To compare two programs for training industrial workers to perform a skilled job, 20 workers are included in an experiment. Of t

nikklg [1K]

Answer:

$t=\frac{19.1-23.3}{\sqrt{\frac{4.818^2}{10}+\frac{5.559^2}{10}}}}=-1.805$

$p_v =P(t_{(18)}$

If we compare the p value and the significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ we see that $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can conclude the the true mean for method 1 is lower than the mean for the method 2 at 5% of significance

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

We can calculate the sample mean and deviation with these formulas:

$\bar X = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i}{n}$

$s= \sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i -\bar X)^2}{n-1}}$

$\bar X_{1}=19.1$ represent the mean for the sample mean for 1

$\bar X_{2}=23.3$ represent the mean for the sample mean for 2

$s_{1}=4.818$ represent the sample standard deviation for the sample 1

$s_{2}=5.559$ represent the sample standard deviation for the sample 2

$n_{1}=10$ sample size selected 1

$n_{2}=10$ sample size selected 2

$\alpha$ represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.

t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)

State the null and alternative hypotheses.

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the average time taken when training under method 1 is less than the average time for Method 2, the system of hypothesis would be:

Null hypothesis: $\mu_{1} \geq \mu_{2}$

Alternative hypothesis: $\mu_{1} < \mu_{2}$

If we analyze the size for the samples both are less than 30 so for this case is better apply a t test to compare means, and the statistic is given by:

$t=\frac{\bar X_{1}-\bar X_{2}}{\sqrt{\frac{s^2_{1}}{n_{1}}+\frac{s^2_{2}}{n_{2}}}}$ (1)

t-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine whether the means of two groups are equal to each other".

Calculate the statistic

We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:

$t=\frac{19.1-23.3}{\sqrt{\frac{4.818^2}{10}+\frac{5.559^2}{10}}}}=-1.805$

P-value

The first step is calculate the degrees of freedom, on this case:

$df=n_{1}+n_{2}-2=10+10-2=18$

Since is a one sided test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(t_{(18)}$

Conclusion

If we compare the p value and the significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ we see that $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, and we can conclude the the true mean for method 1 is lower than the mean for the method 2 at 5% of significance

4 0

2 years ago