That kind of fallacy is called Argumentum ad Hominem. It means the argument is addressed to the person; attacking that person instead the issue. There is an irrelevance because the argument is against to the person making a claim, rather against to the claim itself. An example is judging a person's social status or attitude, like calling his strategies aren't effective to finish a certain task because of his untidiness and laziness.
The Qin dynasty paid for their great building projects by<u> </u><u>Taxing the people</u>
This affected the fall of the Qin Empire because:
- <u>It destroyed the economy and caused a revolt</u>
Some of the building projects that were undertaken by the Qin empire includes:
- The Great Wall of China
- The Lingqu Canal
- The Dujiangyan Irrigation System
- The Zhengguo Canal, etc
These great building projects were mostly financed by collecting levies and taxing the people which was so expensive for the people to continue paying. This eventually led to a revolt of the people against the Qin dynasty.
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/18464903
Answer:
The correct answer would be Verbal Communication.
Explanation:
When someone is able to convey his message to the other person or group of persons, in a strong manner, with clear and unambiguous delivery of message, the person is said to have extra ordinary communication skills. There are different types of communications, like verbal, writing, gestures, facial, body, etc. The best way to communicate through the other person is through mouth. So verbal communication is considered to be the extensive communication skill among all others.
Answer:
June 14, 1946 (age 73 years), Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, New York, NY
The answer to this question is:
"doesn't require a quorum."
Your Welcome :)