Answer: their differences lie in that Stoicism thinks of long-term pleasure while Epicureanism thinks of living to the fullest.
Explanation:
To better explain both terms, Stoicism thinks that it is important to abstain from the pleasure of the moment in order to obtain long-term rewards. It focuses on living properly and morally. In Epicureanism the important thing is pleasure, living life in the moment because tomorrow no one knows what might happen, what matters is the present.
Answer:
No, he didn't
Explanation:
Marx believed that the relationship between the lower class and upper class were exclusively beneficial for the upper class.
According to his perspective, Upper class owned the resources and employed the labors from the lower class. The profit that generated from that labor mostly will obtained by the upper class while the lower class obtain very little from it. On top of that, the sales of the product that created by the effort were mostly bought by the lower class citizens and trapped them in never ending cycle.
Answer: B.) a system in which products were made rapidly by machines
Explanation:
i just took the test
Answer:
I think it's the second one
Answer:
The trial court focus on presentation of the evidence and examination of the witnesses while appellate courts there are no any kind of witnesses.
Explanation:
In trial court, both sides of the groups present the evidence to show the version of them to the court of what happened. Most of evidence which are presented in trial court comes from the witnesses and exhibits.
On the other side, in appellate courts, witnesses are not there, and any kind of the evidence is not presented. In the appellate courts, lawyers simply argue the legal and the policy issues before judges.
