If you are referring to news* instead of "nows", the direct pattern should be used when firmness is necessary and the receiver may overlook look it. This provides for a clear explanation and understanding.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The question presumes you have access to a computer algebra system. The one I have access to provided the output in the attachment. The list at the bottom is the list of the first four derivatives of f(x).
__
The derivatives alternate signs, so (-1)^k will be a factor.
The numerators start at 17 and increase by increasing factors: 2, 3, 4, indicating k! will be a factor.
The denominators have a degree that is k+1.
Putting these observations together, we can write an expression for the k-th derivative of f(x):
Answer:
B. 187
Step-by-step explanation:
I think this is correct I took a test on this before
In order to reduce ANY fraction to lowest terms, find any common factors
of the numerator and denominator, and divide them both by it. If they still
have a common factor, then divide them by it again. Eventually, they won't
have any common factor except ' 1 ', and then you'll know that the fraction is
in lowest terms.
Do 15 and 40 have any common factors ?
Let's see . . .
The factors of 15 are 1, 3, <em>5</em>, and 15 .
The factors of 40 are 1, 2, 4,<em> 5</em>, 8, 10, 20, and 40 .
Ah hah ! Do you see that ' <em>5</em> ' on both lists ? That's a common factor.
So 15/40 is NOT in lowest terms.
Divide the numerator and denominator both by 5 :
15 / 40 =<em> 3 / 8</em>
3 and 8 don't have any common factor except ' 1 '.
So 3/8 is the same number as 15/40, but in lowest terms.
