Answer:
Multiple reimbursement scheme
Explanation:
What Donna Holbrook did is considered a case of multiple reimbursement. This means she requested the payment of the expense more than once. She first used the company credit card to buy the office supplies. This means that she didn’t use her own money because the credit card wasn’t hers. But a month after that, she used the receipt to request reimbursement from the company implying that she bought those supplies with her own money. By doing so, the company is paying twice for a purchase that was done only once. There’re also other kind of expense reimbursement schemes: <u>fictitious expense schemes</u> (when the expense is actually not real but made up by the employee); <u>overstated expense schemes</u> (when the employee inflates the expense in order to keep the extra money); and <u>mischaracterized expense schemes</u> (this occurs when the employee intends to get reimbursement for an expense that is personal and not related to the business).
One persons focus of control is one person's impact on a situation.
Circumstance is beyond one person's control but influenced by everyone's interactions to the situation.
Answer:
the painting probloly is showing what the painting means.
Answer:
These are the two correct answer choices:
A The modern map includes A land masses the ancient map does not show.
D The modern map shows the shapes of land masses more accurately than the ancient map.
Explanation:
The two answer choices above are closely related. Ancient maps often were less detailed than modern maps because ancient cartographers, geographers, and sailors had less technical tools to craft their maps.
Ancient maps were usually partial maps as well: they only showed specific geographical areas, while leaving other areas uncovered, simply because the authors did not even know what territories lied beyond certain geographical limits. For examples, the Ancient Greeks did not know of Subsaharan Africa, so their maps did not give account of that part of the world.
Answer:
Inter rater reliability
Explanation:
Inter-Rater Reliability refers to the degree of agreement among raters. The statistical measurements determining similarity of the data collected with minimum difference based on the skill, performance and behavior in a human.
The two athletic trainers need to evaluate the star of basketball team with close observations to ensure validity of the experiment. The degree of agreement must be as greater and converging as it can, expressed in terms of correlation coefficient.
A reliability report with maximum homogeneity and consensus is believed to be highest in proper evaluation.
