Need more information to answer this particular question.
Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant
Explanation:
The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.
As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.
Answer:
asfatdsfgsdfrawfgdsgsdfgsdfgsrgfdsdfgsfdgsr
Explanation:
Answer:
Robbery
Explanation:
Robbery and larceny may seem similar but there's a difference between the two. The basic distinction between robbery and larceny crimes is that robbery involves the <em>use of force</em>, whereas larceny doesn’t. So, in the scenario provided, force was used in order to deprive someone of their property. Thus, the answer is B.) Robbery.
