Answer:
It would roll in this direction.

Step-by-step explanation:
It would roll to the direction of maximum decrease, which is the -1 times the direction of maximum increase, which is given by the gradient of the function.
Since

For this case, the gradient of your function would be

And -1 times the gradient of your function would be

Then, at

So it would go towards

The magnitud of that vector is

and to conclude it would roll in this direction.

Answer:
0.77777778
Step-by-step explanation:
24/5 = 4.8 No because there is a remainder
Interesting question.
It will describe a multi step proof if the givens have to be restated.
It does depend on theorems and postulates or could.
Geometric statements require that they logically fall into the pattern needed for a proof. This statement is also true.
But the best answer is D. If you provide 1 counterexample, you don't need to go any further. <<<<< Answer.