1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Otrada [13]
3 years ago
8

Why do banks practice fractional reserve banking?

Law
1 answer:
USPshnik [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Fractional reserve banking has pros and cons. It permits banks to use funds (the bulk of deposits) that would be otherwise unused to generate returns in the form of interest rates on loans—and to make more money available to grow the economy

You might be interested in
A federal system of government has
Aleonysh [2.5K]
Layers of government.
It is the right answer
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Must be at least 25 years of age
Inessa [10]
A Governor because representatives you have to live in the state at least five years and so do senators
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is “banking education”? Further indicate why, in terms thereof, “the student
melisa1 [442]

The banking concept of education is known too be one where the teachers are known to be depositing knowledge in brain of their students and they are very much do expect the student to memorize everything, and not learn it.

<h3>What is banking education system?</h3>

This concept is known to be used instead of communicating. Here,  the teacher is said to to give and makes deposits which the students is known to receive, memorize, and they have to repeat it.

This is the "banking" concept of education, is one which the scope of work is one that allowed to students prolong only as far as receiving and keeping the deposits.

Learn more about banking from

brainly.com/question/8225599

6 0
2 years ago
Individual Debate
Rufina [12.5K]

Actually I believe that a guaranteed minimum livable income is not a bad idea at all. In the last democratic debate (USA) between the candidates that were debating to become who was to be in the place of current winner Joe Biden, Candidate <u><em>Andrew Yang</em></u> made a proposal of a Universal Basic Income plan that consisted of small increments of taxes on every sale big corporate businesses like amazon make, and this is a tax under a dollar. If we tax all of these corporations on their sales, we can make trillions of dollars to give at least 1,000 dollars to EVERYONE every month. And he meant everyone, ranging from the homeless, poor, to rich, to even corporations themselves. Andrew Yang also wanted to tax companies that took advantage of robots to manufacture products, as people are losing jobs because of the automation surge that no one is paying any attention to.

People will end up spending that money at stores which  anyway, and the money will circulate and create a trickle up economy that makes so much sense and it's such a simple idea.

So the money is basically given to everyone, and a portion will be given back to corporations. Everyone is a winner without anyone sucking in too much from corporations, as that is what their (the corporations and people in favor for them )argument in defense is.

So that would be the base argument by people who believe minimum livable income is not a good idea. It would be that "<em>taking money from the rich isn't fair because the rich has earned that themselves, and the people that it is being given to don't deserve it."</em>

It's not a very great argument to really be honest though as that is only a believe that is formed by an ideology. That specific <em>"They've earned it themselves, so they do not need to share at all"</em> is a dangerous belief even in a liberalistic capitalist society. Although, Capitalism is a pretty successful ideology but it has its flaws just like Socialism/Communism has.

3 0
3 years ago
After deciding not to served alcohol to two suspected minors, what is the next appropriate action?
kupik [55]
They would be asked to show ID’s

if there false police would be contacted

if no ID’s are provided they are to be escorted off the property

hope this helps
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can I record a conversation in Arkansas?
    14·2 answers
  • How do forensic scientists use scientific reasoning in order to process a crime scene and the evidence found there?
    14·1 answer
  • State the exclusionary rule states that if evidence is found during an illegal search
    11·2 answers
  • Powers listed in the Constitution are known as
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the difference of offer and invitation to treat.​
    11·2 answers
  • Who decides what is evidence is relevant and admissible according to federal evidence rules?
    7·1 answer
  • Anyone else have a very dark sense of humor, like laugh at someone being hit by a car and being turned into an XD kinda dark?
    5·2 answers
  • Creativity does not originate from nothing.” Explain your<br> understanding of this phrase.
    9·2 answers
  • What is one major difference between the federal and state lawmaking
    5·1 answer
  • What is the importance of conducting due diligence?​
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!