Answer:
1. Invalid and weak
2. Invalid and strong.
Explanation:
The first argument does not present statements that support and justify it and for that reason, we can consider it a weak argument. In addition, the conclusion of the argument is not consistent with its premise, presenting a fallacy and causing wrong reasoning, which shows that the argument is invalid.
Similarly, the second argument has a conclusion that contradicts the information shown above, which invalidates the argument. However, the argument presents additional information that can support and justify it, for this reason, we can consider it a strong argument.
Answer:
The three R's – reduce, reuse and recycle – all help to cut down on the amount of waste we throw away. They conserve natural resources, landfill space and energy. Plus, the three R's save land and money communities must use to dispose of waste in landfills.
Explanation:
Answer:
B) anorexia, binge-eating-purging type
Explanation:
Anorexia nervosa can be defined as the way in which a person restricts themselves from taking or eating food which tend to lead to significantly reduction in their body weight which is less than 85% of their ideal body weight based on the person age and height due to their intense fear of gaining weight even when such person has a low body weight although this person may be underweight but may think that they are over weight .
Binge eating disorder (BED) occur when a person keep eating large amount of food because the person tend to lack how to control it making them to eat excessively whether they are hunger or not.
In some case this person can also place restrictions on the quantity of food they consume including the type of food they consumed and they sometimes display or show purging behaviour by inducing themselves to vomit.
Therefore Anorexia nervosa, binge-eating disorder is the severe disturbances in eating behavior and weight management.
Best most likely have ANEREXIA, BINGE-EATING PURGING TYPE
The correct answer is “Like Plato, Aristotle, wrote extensively on the subjects of tyranny and the rule of law.”
Here the author is saying that Plato and Aristotle both had views on tyranny, politics and government and that they both believed that the rule of laws are needed to protect against tyranny.
The Constitution is difficult to amend because it requires a supermajority of either members of Congress or a supermajority of state legislatures to propose a new amendment for ratification.
