Answer:
The people who most commonly speak at a sentencing hearing are the prosecutors, the defense attorney, the victims, and the defendant. Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure grants both the defendant and defense counsel the right to speak to the court before a sentence is imposed. First, even before a defendant appears before a judge, prosecutors may agree, as part of a plea agreement, to recommend a lower sentence or to charge a less serious crime in exchange for the defendant's cooperation.
I think the answer is true
:):):):):)
When it comes to international terrorism, there is a lot more that goes into it than crime detection, apprehension, and punishment so this is <u>FALSE</u>.
<h3>What are organized responses to international terrorism?
</h3>
International terrorism is quite complicated and requires more processes to be resolved than crime detection, apprehension, and punishment.
Sometimes it isn't possible to detect the crimes early enough and even when you do, there are political barriers to apprehension.
In conclusion, this is false.
Find out more on terrorism at brainly.com/question/1490223.
Answer:
It is not
Explanation:
the state does not recognize it
Answer:
In simple words, In order to reconcile human rights with both the common interest, the courts must determine each circumstance on a scenario-by-case basis, bearing into consideration democratic values, existing statutes and previous Supreme Court and other tribunals decisions.
In America, our Constitution and other founding documents grant certain human freedoms or civil liberties. America's founders, including Thomas Jefferson as well as James Madison, intentionally placed these freedoms throughout the Bill of Rights because the government might consider it quite challenging to abrogate them.
