Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
(A) The given statement is:A square is a parallelogram-------A square is always a parallelogram (By properties of parallelogram)(B) The given statement is:A rectangle is a trapezoid----------A rectangle is never a trapezoid.(C) The given statement is:A rhombus is a square--------A rhombus is sometimes a square.(D) The given statement is:A quadrilateral is a kite--------A quadrilateral is sometimes a kite.
Answer:
<u>Answer (a):</u>
s + l = 22 ... (i)
43s + 75l = 1234 ... (ii)
<u>Answer (b)</u>
9 large dogs.
Step-by-step explanation:
Paws at Play made a total of $1234 grooming 22 dogs.
Paws at Play charges $43 to groom each small dog and;
$75 for each large dog.
Let the number of small dogs be 's'
And the number of large dogs be 'l'
<u>A system of equations will be:</u>
s + l = 22 ... (i)
43s + 75l = 1234 ... (ii)
Solving this set of simultaneous equations by elimination, we simply multiply (i) by 43 to get;
43s + 43l = 946 ... (i)
43s + 75l = 1234 ... (ii)
Subtracting (i) from (ii) we get;
32l = 288 , l = 
= 9
So there are 9 large dogs.
Answer:
The calculated value of t= 0.1908 does not lie in the critical region t= 1.77 Therefore we accept our null hypothesis that fatigue does not significantly increase errors on an attention task at 0.05 significance level
Step-by-step explanation:
We formulate null and alternate hypotheses are
H0 : u1 < u2 against Ha: u1 ≥ u 2
Where u1 is the group tested after they were awake for 24 hours.
The Significance level alpha is chosen to be ∝ = 0.05
The critical region t ≥ t (0.05, 13) = 1.77
Degrees of freedom is calculated df = υ= n1+n2- 2= 5+10-2= 13
Here the difference between the sample means is x`1- x`2= 35-24= 11
The pooled estimate for the common variance σ² is
Sp² = 1/n1+n2 -2 [ ∑ (x1i - x1`)² + ∑ (x2j - x`2)²]
= 1/13 [ 120²+360²]
Sp = 105.25
The test statistic is
t = (x`1- x` ) /. Sp √1/n1 + 1/n2
t= 11/ 105.25 √1/5+ 1/10
t= 11/57.65
t= 0.1908
The calculated value of t= 0.1908 does not lie in the critical region t= 1.77 Therefore we accept our null hypothesis that fatigue does not significantly increase errors on an attention task at 0.05 significance level
