Question Continuation
Determine the tax consequences of the redemption to Tammy and to Broadbill under the following independent circumstances.
Tammy and Jeremy are grandmother and grandson.
Answer:
See Explanation Below
Explanation:
Given.
Tammy number of shares = 300
Yvette number of shares = 400
Jeremy number of shares = 300
Each of the shareholders paid $50 per share.
Tammy's Ownership is calculated by; (300+300)/1000
= 600)1000
= 60% ---- before redemption
Tammy's Ownership = (150 + 300)/850
Tammy's ownership = 450/850
Tammy's Ownership = 52.94% ---- after redemption
The constructive ownership of Tammy is more than 80%, this means that the distribution is considered as income to Tammy
Answer:
The correct option is A, Samantha weed and Adam will rake because these are the goods each has a comparative advantage in.
Explanation:
The opportunity formula comes handy in this case, which is given below:
opportunity cost formula=what one sacrifices/what one gains
If Samantha were to weed flower beds, opportunity cost is computed thus:
Opportunity cost of Samantha weeding flower beds=8/4= 2 bags of leaves raked
The opportunity of Adam weeding flower beds=25/5 =5 bags of leaves raked.
In a nutshell ,if Samantha weeds flowers they would lose 2 bags of leaves raked while if Adam were to do so same, they would lose 5 bags of leaves raked, conclusively Samantha should weed flower beds since she has lower opportunity, higher comparative advantage
I would say D, you don’t need a million dollar death benefit if you have no one to claim it.
D because many people are travelling together and the train can occasionally coast due to level travel and the greater the mass the more often the momentum
Answer:
The cause may be environmental
Explanation:
The ratios show that ratio of incidence of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in the population of country X is five times higher than the ratio in U.S. whites. However, the ratio of CLL in migrants from Country X to the U. S. is exactly the same as the ratio in U.S. whites. This relationship indicates that, rather than being genetic, the cause of CLL is more likely to be environmental.
