"Are you sure you left it on the table?" asked Roberto. is the only correctly punctuated sentence here.
the first sentence requires a COMMA inside the quotations, rather than a period. "Judy said" is attached to the quote, because the quote is judy's words. you keep them together, rather than making them two separate sentences.
the third sentence is missing a comma as well. "oh no," sarah said... is the correct way to write it, with a comma after "no."
the fourth sentence is wrong for several reasons. your end punctuation goes inside your parentheses, and this sentence put the exclamation point after. "She laughed" additionally requires a period to end the sentence, stating that she laughed, then offering her dialogue. alternatively, you could place a comma after "laughed" and accept that for the verb leading into the quote.
The standard form is 16*4
The answer to whether or not you can use two negative words is true i believe.
<span>True</span>
<span>
</span>
<span>Dialogue certainly is the best
method to use when analyzing a character because we can learn so much. Let’s say you are reading a story where the
main character reads a sign a person standing on a street corner is holding
that says, “Can you spare some change?”
After reading that sign, the main character walks up to that person and
yells in his face, “Why don’t you go get a job!?” What can be learned from this interaction? What can be deciphered from this is that the
main character is insensitive to the plights of others and apparently incapable
(or unwilling) to see things objectively and from a perspective other than his
own so much so that he jumps to conclusions and feels the person is just lazy
when, in fact, the person may have just recently lost a job, has bills that
need immediate paying, and/or is perhaps waiting for unemployment benefits to
become active while looking for a new job.
As you can see, thus, dialogue can be quite useful in analyzing a
character.</span>