Which sentence uses an objective case pronoun as an indirect object?
I sent him an attachment that included photos of the picnic.
The indirect object him identifies to whom the action of the verb <u>sent</u> is performed.
<em>Wrong options:</em>
I e-mailed him yesterday.
(The direct object <em>him</em> is the receiver of action within this sentence: I emailed him).
He wrote back to Bob and I with an answer to our questions.
(I is not an objective case pronoun; it should be "He wrote back to Bob and <u>me</u>...")
So, once again, the answer is the 2nd sentence (I sent him an attachment that included photos of the picnic.)
Umm... not quite sure what you're looking for... but a theme of <em>To Kill A Mockingbird</em> is racial prejudice because the whole reason Tom lost his case is the fact that he was a black man; it was open-and-shut really.
Answer:
a combination of both because too much capitalism will lead to unprotected rights for workers and middle class while oligarchs profits. Too much communism will lead to proverty and no individual rights and ownership of their property. A blend between two political system is better because we could take the good aspect of both ideology and implement it.
The correct way to caption the sentence in the question is "We’re gonna go to Paris in a few days, then we’re off to Venice," as shown in option 3.
<h3>Caption rules</h3>
When we caption or transcribe what someone says, there are some rules we must pay attention to. Even though contractions such as "gonna" sound extremely informal, they should be captioned that way. In other words, we do not need to change "gonna" for "going to."
On the other hand, there is no need to caption hesitation words or sounds such as "um." With that in mind, we can choose option 3 as the correct answer for this question.
Learn more about captions here:
brainly.com/question/1752247
#SPJ1