1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
leonid [27]
3 years ago
7

Can an action be legal but immoral, Can an action be morally right but unlawful?

Law
2 answers:
pogonyaev3 years ago
8 0
Well of course. The person above goes into better detail.
Rudik [331]3 years ago
7 0
1. yes. like the jim crow laws. they discriminated against african americans and made things very unfair. it was completely legal, but not moral at all. it’s very inhuman to treat others like that

2. yes. like helping a holocaust victim escape or hide from the nazi’s. it was illegal but people wanted to do it to help and protect them
You might be interested in
What do profilers use to create the profile? *
gregori [183]

Answer:

The answer is Crime scene and victims...

7 0
3 years ago
L 4.2.5 Quiz: Exchange Rates
NeX [460]

Answer:

c i think

Explanation:

beacrse

4 0
3 years ago
What is the arm signal for a left turn?​
zhenek [66]
You use your left arm to signal for turns and for a stop. Arm up means right turn. Arm straight out means left turn. Arm down means stopping
5 0
4 years ago
In your own words, describe what Democracy is, and evaluate democracy in your own words. (8 Mark Question)Required to answer. Mu
MatroZZZ [7]

Explanation:

The notion of democracy has evolved over time considerably, and, generally, the two current types of democracy are direct and representative. In a direct democracy, the people directly deliberate and decide on legislation. In a representative democracy, the people elect representatives to deliberate and decide on legislation, such as in parliamentary or presidential democracy. Liquid democracy combines elements of these two basic types.

Prevalent day-to-day decision making of democracies is the majority rule, though other decision making approaches like supermajority and consensus have been equally integral to democracies. They serve the crucial purpose of inclusiveness and broader legitimacy on sensitive issues, counterbalancing majoritarianism, and therefore mostly take precedence on a constitutional level.

In the common variant of liberal democracy, the powers of the majority are exercised within the framework of a representative democracy, but the constitution limits the majority and protects the minority, usually through the enjoyment by all of certain individual rights, e.g. freedom of speech, or freedom of association. Besides these general types of democracy, there have been a wealth of further types.

Democracy makes all forces struggle repeatedly to realize their interests and devolves power from groups of people to sets of rules. Western democracy, as distinct from that which existed in antiquity, is generally considered to have originated in city-states such as Classical Athens and the Roman Republic, where various schemes and degrees of enfranchisement of the free male population were observed before the form disappeared in the West at the beginning of late antiquity. The English word dates back to the 16th century, from the older Middle French and Middle Latin equivalents.

According to American political scientist Larry Diamond, democracy consists of four key elements: a political system for choosing and replacing the government through free and fair elections; the active participation of the people, as citizens, in politics and civic life; protection of the human rights of all citizens; and a rule of law, in which the laws and procedures apply equally to all citizens. Todd Landman, nevertheless, draws our attention to the fact that democracy and human rights are two different concepts and that "there must be greater specificity in the conceptualisation and operationalisation of democracy and human rights"

6 0
3 years ago
Court implications on IPV
sweet [91]
The concept of therapeutic jurisprudence suggests that the court should be evaluated not just for its potential effect on recidivism, but for its impact on the well-being of all those who participate in it, and IPV scholars suggest that empowerment is a key component of any therapeutic intervention for victims.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please answer this question.
    9·1 answer
  • Why did Colonial America adopt only part of the English legal system?
    9·2 answers
  • Explain the difference between an unendorsed PAP, and an endorsed PAP
    8·1 answer
  • An act under the other acts exception must have occurred
    10·1 answer
  • What is the difference between the establishment clause and free exercise clause
    5·2 answers
  • If someone owns a piece of land, do they own it all the way to the center of the earth?
    10·2 answers
  • How many Representatives are in Congress from each state?
    8·2 answers
  • Identify the type of energy. Tearing a piece of paper in half is (What energy?)
    11·2 answers
  • Badger Bank and Trust (Badger) is a community bank in Oshkosh, Wisconsin. Badger loaned $5,000 to Plessy and charged him an inte
    15·1 answer
  • I need friends, can i be your friend?
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!