Answer:
A-she can deduct her mileage for driving from her home to her office at the professional suite
B-she can deduct her home office expenses
Explanation:
As a general rule of thumb, every expenses that incurred for business operation can be deducted from your taxes. This rule can still applicable even if you're working from your home.
A car mileage <u>can only be deducted according to the proportion that is used for work</u><u> </u> since it's considered as an expense that must incurred in order for Gwen to do her business.
Lunch money is considered as private consumption that does not related to her business operation. This is why it's not tax deducible.
The correct answer is 2.2 hours.
I<span>f Eva uses the earliest due date priority rule, the order of the dresses will be as follows: W (1 hour processing time, 1 hour due); Y (2 hrs processing time, 3 hrs due); V (3 hrs processing time, 5 hrs due); Z (5 hrs processing time, 7 hrs due); X (4 hrs processing time, 9 hrs due).</span>
It's easier to do the next step using real numbers. For example, if it's 11am now and W is due in 1 hour, then W is due at noon. If Y is due in 3 hours, then Y is due at 2pm, etc. Then, you need to use the processing time to see how long it will take to make the dresses. For example, since W takes one hour to process, it will be done by noon, its due date.
This means that W and Y will be altered on time, V will be 1 hour late, Z will be 4 hours late, and X will be 6 hours late. To find the average tardiness, add these extra hours (1+4+6) = 11, and divide by the total number of dresses (even the ones that weren't late) 5: 11/5 = 2.2 hours.
Answer:
$50.74 million
Explanation:
Interest rate per annum = 8%
Number of years = 17
Number of compounding per annum = 1
Interest rate per period (r) = 8%/1 = 8%
Number of period (n) =17 * 1 = 17
Growth rate (g) = 5%
First payment (P) = 4 ($'million)
PV of the new Chip = p/(r-g) * [1 - [(1+g)/(1+r)]^n]
PV of the new Chip = 4/(8%-5%) * [1 - [(1+5%)/(1+8%)]^17]
PV of the new Chip = 4/0.03 * [1 - [1.05/1.08]^17]
PV of the new Chip = 4/0.03 * [1 - 0.972222^17]
PV of the new Chip = 133.333 * (1 - 0.6194589804)
PV of the new Chip = 133.333 * 0.3805410196
PV of the new Chip = 50.7386757663268
PV of the new Chip = $50.74 million
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
Taxes on goods with INELASTIC demand curves will tend to raise more tax revenue for the government than taxes on goods with ELASTIC.
Goods with inelastic demand are insensitive to price. An increase price of the goods for example from an increase in tax on the goods will have no significant effect in the quantity demanded. Consumers will still buy it with an higher. So taxing this goods is a good source of revenue for the government.
Whereas goods with elastic demand are very sensitive to rice. Any slight increase in price will result in a significant decrease in quantity demanded. So government increasing tax on this good will be bad for its tax revenue because consumers won't be it
Answer:
Sales 950,000
Less: Relevant cost:
Variable expenses 380,000
Avoidable fixed manufacturing expenses 217,000
Avoidable fixed selling and administrative expenses 178,000
Contribution 175,000
The total profit of Furrow Corporation reduces by $175,000 if the product is discontinued.
Explanation:
In this question, there is need to determine contribution, which is the excess of sales over relevant costs. Relevant costs are comprised of variable cost and avoidable fixed costs. The product should not be discontinued since the contribution is positive. Deleting a product with positive contribution reduces the total profit of the company by the amount of positive contribution.
