The inconsistency described above is known as cognitive dissonance. It is a theory that describes the tendency of an individual to find consistency of the cognitive functions. When this is not met, some behaviors and attitudes are to be changed in order to eliminate the inconsistency.
Answer:
Option (d) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Direct materials = $44,200
Direct labor = $31,800
Manufacturing overhead = $25,200
Selling expenses = $22,100
Administrative expenses = $37,100
Conversion cost:
= Direct labor + Manufacturing overhead
= $31,800 +$25,200
= $57,000
Therefore, the conversion costs during the month totaled $57,000.
Answer:
b. did not know of the reward when he returned the dog.
Explanation:
Laredo advertises for getting his dog back. This does not infer that the dog will only be returned when the reward will be paid.
Miguel did not know about the reward, so the reward in this case is not mandatory to be paid, but if Laredo initiates the reward himself, that can be accepted.
This is a clear demonstration of being kind and get what you know.
So if you do not know the facts, you are on fault.
Answer:
1.15
Explanation:
If investment is made in equal proportions, it means that;
weight in risk free ; wRF = 33.33% or 0.3333
Let the stocks be A and B
weight in stock A ; wA = 33.33% or 0.3333
weight in stock B; wB = 33.33% or 0.3333
Beta of A; bA = 1.85
Let the beta of the other stock be represented by "bB"
Beta of risk free; bRF = 0
Beta of portfolio = 1 since it is mentioned that "the total portfolio is equally as risky as the market "
The weight of portfolio is equal to the sum of the weighted average beta of the three assets. The formula is as follows;
wP = wAbA + wBbB + wRF bRF
1 = (0.3333 * 1.85) + (0.3333*bB) + (0.3333 *0)
1 = 0.6166 +0.3333bB + 0
1 - 0.6166 = 0.3333bB
0.3834 = 0.3333bB
Next, divide both sides by 0.3333 to solve for bB;
bB = 0.3834/0.3333
w=bB = 1.15
Therefore, the beta for the other stock would be 1.15
