1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vfiekz [6]
3 years ago
11

Historians believe that, for most countries involved in the conflict, World War I's root causes were varied and complex, though

many still point to the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand as the immediate precursor to war.
(A) Historians believe that, for most countries involved in the conflict, World War I's root causes were varied and complex
(B) Historians believe that variation and complexity were there for most countries involved in the conflict by the World War I's root causes
(C) The historians' belief is, for most countries involved in the conflict, root causes were varied and complex for World War I
(D) For most countries involved in the conflict, the historians' belief that World War I's root causes were varied and complex
(E) For most countries being involved in the conflict, historians believe that the root causes that World War I had were varied and complex
History
1 answer:
a_sh-v [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The correct answer  is Option E: For most countries being involved in the conflict, historians believe that the root caused that World War I had were varied and complex.

Explanation:

This is the correct statement becaue the fist part of the sentence it includes the subject and theexplanations of why the countries were involve is at the end of the sentence.

You might be interested in
Select the statement that indicates protectionism
Norma-Jean [14]

Answer:the answer should be the last sentence

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
In 980 AD became the prince of Kiev He converted to orthodox Christianity to unify his people
Rama09 [41]

Correct Answer: Vladimir the Great

Vladimir the Great was the Grand Prince of Kiev from 980 until the day he died in 1015. Although he was not the first to introduce Christianity into the Kievan Rus region (today Ukraine and Russia), he was the one who cemented it as the majoritarian religion in the area after his baptism in 988, ordering the end of paganism in the area (not without certain opposition). He unified most of this region unider his mandate.

As for the reason he chose Orthodox Christianity, it is somewhat shrouded in legend. The popular tale says that he sent emissaries to learn about the religions of neighboring. When they came back, he didn't like what he heard about the restrictions Islam and Judaism imposed, and he didn't find anything interesting in what was said of Westen Christianity. Instead, he was marveled by his emissaries tales of the Orthodox temples, as they said "they didn't know whether they were in heaven or Earth". As for the more historically accurate version, it is said that he converted in part as part of a military pact.


8 0
3 years ago
How much does the president get for his expense account?
IgorC [24]

Answer:

the president will get to enjoy the luxurious benefits that come with the president is also granted 50,000 annual expense account 100,000

5 0
3 years ago
Why should historians avoid oversimplifications when analyzing sources?
Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory  evidence</em></u>

Explanation:

History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.

For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.

However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.

Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.

While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.

3 0
3 years ago
How did the March Revolution end the reign of Czar Nicholas II?
Ksivusya [100]
In March 1917, the army barracks at Petrograd united striking workers in challenging socialist reforms, and Czar Nicholas II was enforced to step down from his leadership. Nicholas and his family were first detained at the Czarskoye Selo palace, then in the Yekaterinburg palace near Tobolsk. In July 1918, the improvement of anti-revolutionary forces caused the Yekaterinburg Soviet forces to fear that Nicholas might be set free. After a secret meeting, a death sentence was approved on the imperial family, and Nicholas, his wife, his children, and several of their servants were gunned down on the night of July 16.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When did the partisan press era take place? (5 points)
    10·2 answers
  • Describe the main details of both Jay’s Treaty between the US and Great Britain, and Pinckney’s Treaty between the US and Spain.
    7·2 answers
  • Which action best illustrates the Cold War policy
    12·2 answers
  • Why did the sale of indulgences become a critical poimt of focus during the renasaissance but not during the middle ages
    8·1 answer
  • Which did settlers bring to american indian lands in the west
    12·1 answer
  • What is the scientific name for modern people
    10·1 answer
  • Congress passed Neutrality Acts in 1935 and 1937.
    12·1 answer
  • Question 4 please! &lt;3
    9·1 answer
  • Please help, ASAP, and being TIMED!!! Will mark brainliest!
    9·1 answer
  • What document was read from the
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!