Mapp Vs Ohio issues refer to a judicial case that took place in 1961, in which the Supreme Court ruled 6 to 3 in a case where evidence presented at a trial was illegally obtained and used against the defendant.
Miss Mapp was a woman who refused to admit the intrussion of three Cleveland police officers into her house in persuit to some evidence in connection with a recent bombing issue. Officers did’nt have any warrant signed by a judge when they arrived to her home.
During the case, attorney allegated the protection of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the US (current since 1791 as a part of the Bill of Rights) for the woman. This amendment forbids unreasonable searches and seizures of individuals and property and implies that the use of evidence obtained in violation of the amendment is unconstitutional
To get more resources and land. i got this from a text book
I believe that 3 is the most concerning issue because everyone was worried that the Soviet Union or some other country would take their land.
He converted the entire religion to Confucianism
Please mark as brainliest
Answer:
A). They were asked to leave the church and the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
Explanation:
Anne Hutchinson and Roger Williams were courageous Puritans who dared to disagree with the religious concepts preached in Massachusetts Bay Colony, a strictly Puritan region.
Anne Hutchinson disagreed that her behavior could change the destiny that God had prepared for her. While Roger Williams, he disagreed with the union between church and state, religious intolerance and the theft of indigenous lands.
The Puritans saw the two as major threats and wasted no time in banning them (Anne was arrested before the ban). As a result Williams bought land from the natives and formed the Rhode Island colony. Subsequently, Hutchinson joined this colony.
