Answer: Reconstruction Finance Corporation
Explanation:
I think they didn’t really have a judgement about who owned the land but had different tribes of different people, the different tribes might’ve had controversy against each other but that isn’t exactly known. Conflicts over the use and ownership of Native lands are not new. Land has been at the center of virtually every significant interaction between Natives and non-Natives since the earliest days of European contact with the indigenous peoples of North America. By the 19th century, federal Indian land policies divided communal lands among individual tribal members in a proposed attempt to make them into farmers. The result instead was that struggling tribes were further dispossessed of their land. In recent decades, tribes, corporations, and the federal government have fought over control of Native land and resources in contentious protests and legal actions, including the Oak Flat, the San Francisco Peaks Controversy, and the Keystone XL pipeline
Answer:
Big companies could grow by merging with other companies or acquiring them. B. Factory workers could start in low positions and work their way up to management.
Explanation:
B. Saddam Hussein
<span>Saddam was the fifth President of Iraq, serving in this capacity from 16 July 1979 until 9 April 2003. Hope this helps </span>
The Confederacy wanted to gain control of the fort because it had a strategic naval advantage.
Thank You!
PM me for more help!
