2. 
Domain:
, because any value of
is allowed and gives a number
.
Range:
, because
for any positive real
.
y-intercept: This is a point of the form
. So plug in
; we get
. So the intercept is (0, 2), or just 2. (Interestingly, you didn't get marked wrong for that...)
Asymptote: This can be deduced from the range; the asymptote is the line
.
Increasing interval: Going from left to right, there is no interval on which
is increasing, since 1/4 is between 0 and 1.
Decreasing interval: Same as the domain;
is decreasing over the entire real line.
End behavior: The range tells you
, and you know
is decreasing over its entire domain. This means that
as
, and
and
.
3. 
Domain: Same as (2),
.
Range: We can rewrite
.
for all
, so
for all
. Then the range is
.
y-intercept: We have
, so the intercept is (0, -6) (or just -6).
Asymptote: 
Increasing interval: Not increasing anywhere
Decreasing interval: 
End behavior: Similar to (2), but this time
as
and
as
.
Answer:
l = -16/3 m = 80/3
Step-by-step explanation:
see attached for step by step
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:this is so easy
Answer:
27 1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
a) Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
b) 
c)
d)
e) For this case since the statistic is lower than the critical value and the p value higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis so then we don't have information to conclude that the true proportion is higher than 0.12
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=1000 represent the random sample selected
X=134 represent the number of young drivers ages 18 – 24 that had an accident
estimated proportion of young drivers ages 18 – 24 that had an accident
is the value that we want to verify
represent the significance level
Confidence=95% or 0.95
z would represent the statistic
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic would be given by:
(1)
Part b
For this case since we are conducting a right tailed test we need to find a critical value in the normal standard distribution who accumulates 0.05 of the area in the right and we got:

Part c
For this case the statistic would be given by:
Part d
The p value can be calculated with the following probability:
Part e
For this case since the statistic is lower than the critical value and the p value higher than the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis so then we don't have information to conclude that the true proportion is higher than 0.12