Answer:
Candonia has a comparative advantage in the production of <u>LEMONS</u>, while Lamponia has a comparative advantage in the production of <u>COFFEE</u>. Suppose that Candonia and Lamponia specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of <u>36</u> million pounds of coffee and <u>36</u> million pounds of lemons.
Explanation:
Since a lot of information was missing, I looked it up and found the attached graphs. The graphs referred to production of coffee and lemons, but I guess they are similar questions.
For every pound of lemons that Candonia produces, it will not be able to produce ¹/₂ pounds of coffee (opportunity cost of producing lemons instead of coffee).
For every pound of coffee that Lamponia produces, it will not be able to produce 1¹/₂ pounds of lemons (opportunity cost of producing coffee instead of lemons).
We see that for every 8 sandwiches that the customer needs, he will pay for 5. Lets see how many groups of 8 sandwiches the order of 675 sandwiches contains. If we do Euclidean Division we see that there are 84 groups of 8 and that three sandwiches are the remainder. 675/8=84.375; Hence we have 84 groups and 0.375*8=3 sandwiches that remain. Thus, the customer would play for 84*5= 420 sandwiches if he had ordered 84 groups of 8 (namely 672 sandwiches). Since he needs another 3 sandwiches and there is no promotional offer for those, he will have to pay in total for 423 sandwiches. It is important to not divide the total number by 8 and then multiply it by 5; the customer gets the free sandwiches only if he completes an offer of 5 sandwiches, thus we have to group the sandwiches in octads and deal with the remainder separately.
Answer: If the commercial is TRUE that every additional bite of food tastes as good as the first, the marginal utility from consuming more of the advertised product must be CONSTANT. Option D.
Explanation:
Marginal utility is the additional satisfaction an individual gets, from consuming an additional unit of a product or service.
Therefore, in the scenario given above, if every additional bite of food tastes as good as the first, then the additional satisfaction is just as good as the preceding satisfaction. We can therefore say that the marginal utility gotten from consuming that product is constant.
Answer:
it is not allocatively efficient
Explanation:
Monopoly is a market condition where one seller has all the market share. This leads to an inefficient market structure, an increase in the prices of goods and services and abnormal profits. A problem with adopting a fair return polity for a natural monopoly is that it is not allocatively efficient. In a monopoly, goods and services are not produced to help the economy or people.
Answer:
competing
Explanation:
because his cooperativeness is low and his assertiveness is high.
