1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olga nikolaevna [1]
3 years ago
13

Who was the 4th President of the US?

Law
2 answers:
Nady [450]3 years ago
8 0

The fourth president of the United States of America is James Madison. He served 2 full 4-year terms, which means he served for eight full years straight, from 1809-1817. He was born on March 16, 1751, and he died on June 28, 1836. He also made a major contribution to the ratification and approval of the US Constitution by writing up "The Federalist Papers," as well as John Jay and Alexander Hamilton. He was later referred to as the "Father of the US Constitution," during the later years of his lifetime. Anyways, to answer your question, the fourth President of the United States of America was James Madison. Hope this helped answer your question. Good day to you.

MrMuchimi3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

4th President of the US: James Madison

You might be interested in
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements comes closest to your
Travka [436]
B

I am studying law right now and I know this is B
5 0
3 years ago
14. Embezzlement is the theft of what?
Dafna11 [192]

<u>Embezzlement</u> is the theft  or misuse of <u>company funds by executives </u>

Explanation:

<u>Embezzlement, refers to the act of withholding the assets of a company with the intention of conversion(theft) by one or more person to whom the assets where entrusted .It is a type of financial fraud</u>

5 0
3 years ago
What document explains your rights and responsibilities as a federal student loan.
tino4ka555 [31]

Answer:

better you write your own answer.... make creative mind not searching mind

hope u understood

5 0
2 years ago
Why, do you suppose, mediation is also known as alternative dispute resolution?
miskamm [114]

Answer:

d. Mediation serves as a viable and affordable alternative to court trials and often ends with the same result as would a trial

Explanation:

Mediation is a situation where two different warring party are called together by a third party who had the aim of trying to resolve their differences between them.

The venue of their meetings could be at the mediators house or neutral ground. The major aim of mediation is to avoid the escalation of the issues which could lead to court cases and litigation by both parties involved. <em>Generally, it is a cheaper option of resolving conflicts rather than going through the court processes.</em>

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is dr. carla o'donnell visiting the jurisville police dept
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following would be considered a responsibility rather than a duty of citizenship at the local level?
    10·1 answer
  • The person granting another person to act on their behalf using a power of attorney is called a _______________.
    6·1 answer
  • When driving during the daytime in reduced visibility, such as rain, smoke, or fog,
    5·2 answers
  • What better Xbox,ps4,pc
    12·2 answers
  • 'Victimhood is not an objective assessment of harm
    15·1 answer
  • Question 19 of 20
    5·1 answer
  • What body of law governs mixed contracts dealing with the sale of both goods and services. Does the UCC Article 2 apply to such
    6·1 answer
  • Under what circumstances may a president be sued
    10·1 answer
  • Phoenix was found guilty as charged; however, the judge deferred imprisonment and stipulated court supervision and demonstration
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!