All categories

2 years ago

2. What were the terms of Wellesley's Subsidiary Alliance?plss my exam is TMRW !!!

History

1 answer:

7nadin3 [17]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

1. The ruler will not keep an army of his own.

2. British troops would be stationed permanently in the Indian ruler's territory.

3. The ruler would have to pay for the maintenance of these troops. The payment could be made in cash or kind, or by ceding a part of the ruler's territory.

4. It was compulsory for the Indian ruler to house a British resident in his court.

5. The ruler could not employ any non-British Europeans in his service or dismiss those who were there.

6. The ruler had to acknowledge the dominion of the British.

You might be interested in

What are some fundamental beliefs that would be on the Libertarian platform?

dedylja [7]

Answer:

Libertarians seek to maximize autonomy and political freedom, emphasizing free association, freedom of choice, individualism and voluntary association. Libertarians share a skepticism of authority and state power, but some libertarians diverge on the scope of their opposition to existing economic and political systems.

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

What was the average closing price in 1924

Hitman42 [59]

The average closing price in 1924 was 2196......

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

20 POINTS !!!! PLEASE HELP ASAP!!! BTW I'LL REPORT ANYONE WHO JUS ANSWERS FOR THE POINTS!!!! Write a 200 worded essay comparing

Leona [35]

Answer:

I believe and consider Nelson Mandela to be a hero because his ways of working things out was bringing himself and his people a better life. On the other hand, Augusto Pinochet, I consider him a villain because he was responsible for many tragedies, yet never really charged for them.

Background

Nelson Mandela was a South African activist, politician, anti-apartheid, and a philanthropist.

Born: July 18, 1918

Died: December 5, 2013

Augusto Pinochet was a Chilean dictator that took his power for granted and gave himself a bad history, although he didn't see it that way.

Born: November 25, 1915

Died: 2006

Contributions

Nelson Mandela taught his nation the real meaning of activism, showed his power for human spirit, brought Apartheid to an end, became first black president of South Africa, and remained devoted to the idea of peace and justice.

Augusto Pinochet, wasn't really a positive contributor. He violated the peoples' rights, ruined education for some, snatched job opportunies, canceled elections that were for good causes, illegally elected himself as president, and he was known for dividing rather than uniting.

Legacy

Nelson Mandela caused a positive impact around the world. He became a representation of an achievement with dedication to a good cause. He also brought peaceful protests and when needed, armed resistance.

Augusto Pinochet is remembered as a cold-hearted who tortured and murdered thousands of people. Murdered/disappeared more than 3,200 and tortured about 28,000. Chile's military today doesn't want to recognize him and political groups that favored him, now reject him and his family.

A Glimpse

Nelson Mandela on the right

Augusto Pinochet on the left

Mandela Arrested

His actions landed him in prison for 27 years. But, before he was senteced a lifetime, he was arrested many times.

Here is a short glimpse of Mandela walking out of prison.

Pinochet Haunted Chile

Here is a short video of Pinochet's life in power.

Conclusion

I chose Mandela as a hero because he is someone I've always been inspired by. He taught to stand up for good causes and remain devoted, until you achieve it.

I chose Pinochet as a villain because I believe he didn't have what it took to be a presisdent, he shouldn't have had any power whatsoever. He was resposible for thousands of deaths

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

What action was an economic cause of increased tension between the north and south

gavmur [86]

In a nutshell, the protective tariffs were responsible for the development of the economy in the north but had the opposite impact in the south where they had the opposite effect.

This is further explained below.

<h3>What action was an economic cause of increased tension between the north and south?</h3>

Generally, One of the economic factors that contributed to the escalating tensions between the North and the South was the protective tariff. In terms of its economy, the North had developed into an industrialized region and had a large number of enterprises. On the other hand, the South maintained a significant reliance on agricultural production.

To assist the Northern Industries, high protective tariffs were imposed on commodities imported from other countries. Because of this, additional goods had to be purchased from northern vendors.

The South was forced to pay a higher price for the items that they imported from Europe as a result of this tariff, which benefited the North but put a bigger burden on the South.

To summarize, the protective tariffs contributed to the expansion of the economy in the north while having the opposite effect in the south.

2. What were the terms of Wellesley's Subsidiary Alliance?plss my exam is TMRW !!!​

2. What were the terms of Wellesley's Subsidiary Alliance?plss my exam is TMRW !!!