Generally, the courts have the power to declare certain types of contracts <u>void </u>on the grounds that they are contrary to<u> public policy</u>.
Courts commonly follow the law that the parties expressly or impliedly intend to govern the agreement, provided that it bears a reasonable relation to the transaction and the parties acted in correct religion.
The primary factors required for the agreement to be a legally enforceable contract are mutual assent, expressed by a valid offer and popularity; ok attention; capability; and legality. In some states, an element of consideration may be glad by using a valid replacement.
A contract is a venture or agreement by using a person or company to do any creation paintings or activity under certain terms and conditions. these terms are used in conditions of settlement in production.
Learn more about the contract here:brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
Answer:
D)To show why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.
Explanation:
John Locke, an English philosopher, widely referred to as Father of Liberalism, examines the "State of Nature" for the purpose of showing why the state of nature is inadequate for determining what our fundamental rights should be.
According to him, each individual in a society has a natural right to protect his or her own life, liberty, and property and at the same time, each individual has a natural right to seek for compensation for any wrongful injury to his or her natural rights; life, liberty, or property which has been inflicted by other individuals.
However, Locke, believed that, since 'state of nature' is more or less a state of insecurity, that is, each individual is not secured to possible infringement of his or her natural rights by other individuals. Hence, the needs to create a civil government, whose purpose is to protect the natural rights, freedom and well-being of all members of society.
This is because, in a "state of nature" there is no legislative or judicial authority that members of the society can seek for help in order to protect their natural rights, such as lives, liberty, or property. But to ensure there is security and protection to individuals natural right, there is need for a civil government, with a judicial authority whose purpose is to resolve disputes fairly and equitably.
Answer:
Explanation:
I believe this question comes down to your opinion.
If I were asked though, I would pick democracy. It's pretty easy to explain.
I would pick democracy, because that makes the rulles of the country elected by the people. :)
hope this helped!
Answer:
"Opponents of the War Powers Resolution have traditionally claimed that clause 11 confers upon Congress only a narrow piece of war power. Defenders of the Resolution have argued in contrast that the Resolution constitutes an exercise of congressional authority under the clause. This last contention pokes at the truth without quite striking it. The War Powers Resolution is not constitutional as an exercise of the war power. It is constitutional because it defines the war power. The War Powers Resolution is nothing more or less than a congressional definition of the word "war" in article I. A definition of this kind coupled with a reasonable enforcement mechanism is well within the power of Congress under a proper understanding of the constitutional system of checks and balances. The definition does not intrude on any presidential prerogative. The mechanisms chosen by Congress to enforce the provisions of the Resolution were reasonable in 1973 and, although matters have been complicated by the United States Supreme Court's decision late last Term in Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, those mechanisms remain reasonable today."
Explanation:
