Joe is speaking at a funeral, so he decides not to open with a joke. He is responding to the situation. As he begins to speak, someone in another room begins hammering on the wall, causing <u>disturbance.</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
A funeral is a ceremony that is done to honor a dead person. Burial or cremations are some ways of honoring the dead person with the attendant observances. The funeral is done to honor or remember their loved one in a special way and express their feelings about the loss of the person. The people face lot of emotions and pain at the funeral.
It is the place where peace should be maintained. Joe started to speak at the funeral of some person close to him to express his pain. So he decided to stay apart from joke. He began to express his feeling regarding the demise. Suddenly there happened a hammering sound on the wall next to his room. This incident greatly disturbed Joe.
Answer:
11
Explanation:
there are 11 hydroelectric dams being built along the mekong river
Answer:
Over hunting would severely hurt and endanger the buffalo population. The slaughter of the buffalo might also cause the population of the Native Americans down.
Explanation:
It would hurt the buffalo, because the less of them, the harder it is to repopulate, but then the native Americans really depend on the buffaloes, they use them for everything, clothes, food, utensils, tools, and even containers!
You're very welcome and HAPPY NEW YEAR!!
Answer:
What follows is a bill of indictment. Several of these items end up in the Bill of Rights. Others are addressed by the form of the government established—first by the Articles of Confederation, and ultimately by the Constitution.
The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “First comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) the protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights—or its systematic violation of rights—can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) at least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.
At the Founding, these ideas were considered so true as to be self-evident. However, today the idea of natural rights is obscure and controversial. Oftentimes, when the idea comes up, it is deemed to be archaic. Moreover, the discussion by many of natural rights, as reflected in the Declaration’s claim that such rights “are endowed by their Creator,” leads many to characterize natural rights as religiously based rather than secular. As I explain in The Structure of Liberty: Justice and the Rule of Law, I believe his is a mistake.
Answer:
This is an example of HOUSE ORGAN
Explanation:
Each quarter, an organization that finds homes for greyhounds that can no longer race mails a newsletter to organization volunteers to let them know the current needs of the organization and how well adoption efforts are going. The newsletter is an example of a HOUSE ORGAN
