Answer: work hard; $65; less; $85
Explanation:
The following can be deduced from the question:
The Expected profit from working hard will be:
= (90% × $200) + (10% × $50)
= (0.9 × $200) + (0.1 × $50)
= $180 + $5
= $185
Then, the profit will be the difference between revenue and coat which will be:
= $185 - $100
= $85
Then, the expected profit from shirking will be:
= (90% × $50) + (10% × $200)
= (0.90 × $50) + (0.10 × $200)
= $45 + $20
= $65
Then, the profit will be:
= $65 - $0
= $65
Eric will (work hard) because the net gain of ($65) from shirking is (less) than the net gain of ($85) from working hard.
Answer:
a prosecutor must establish that the directors had criminal intent
Answer:
(a) $3.48 per unit
(b) 64.2%
Explanation:
(a) Anthony’s contribution margin per unit:
= Selling price per unit - Variable cost per unit
= $5.42 - $1.94
= $3.48 per unit
Therefore, the Anthony’s contribution margin per unit is $3.48 per unit.
(b) Anthony's contribution margin ratio:
= (Contribution Margin Per unit ÷ Selling Price per unit) × 100
= ($3.48 per unit ÷ $5.42 per unit) × 100
= 0.6420 × 100
= 64.20%
Therefore, the Anthony's contribution margin ratio is 64.2%.
Answer:
High-tech firms are hiring expensive, sophisticated people who are in high demand compared to fast food franchises and treat them better to avoid losing them to other companies
Explanation:
High-tech firms are hiring expensive, sophisticated people who are in high demand. This brings about a better treatment of their employees because if they do not offer these amenities to employees, they would become employees of other high-tech companies. Individuals with low skill levels do not get high salaries or benefits. They are not in as high demand as highly skilled workers. It is efficient, but many would argue that it is not fair.
Answer: asset cost, salvage value, useful life, and obsolescence.
Explanation: Any method may be adopted by companies
