1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vilka [71]
3 years ago
12

Help mee pleaseee :(

Mathematics
2 answers:
Sliva [168]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We will need to find the equation and put it in the form y = mx + b where m is the slope and b is the y intercept.

Step 1 - Calculate the slope via the slope formula:

\frac{(y2 - y1)}{(x2 - x1}

We will use the first two x and y variables in the table, so simply plug the values in.

\frac{(-3) - (-1)}{2 - 1}\\

= \frac{-2}{1}  = -2

This means the slope is 2 (y = -2x + b).

Step 2 - Plug the variables in:

To calculate the b, we can use one of the pairs of coordinates i.e. (1, -1) to calculate b by putting the variables into the above equation:

y = -2x + b

-1 = -2(1) + b

-1 = -2 + b

-1 + 2 = b

b = 1

This means the equation is:

y = -2x + 1

Hope this helps!

fgiga [73]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

y = - 2x + 1

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of a line in slope- intercept form is

y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )

Calculate m using the slope formula

m = \frac{y_{2}-y_{1}  }{x_{2}-x_{1}  }

with (x₁, y₁ ) = (1, - 1) and (x₂, y₂ ) = (2, - 3) ← 2 ordered pairs from the table

m = \frac{-3-(-1)}{2-1} = \frac{-3+1}{1} = - 2 , then

y = - 2x + c ← is the partial equation

To find c substitute any ordered pair from the table into the partial equation

Using (3, - 5 ) , then

- 5 = - 6 + c ⇒ c = - 5 + 6 = 1

y = - 2x + 1 ← equation of line

You might be interested in
Jim's work evaluating 2 (three-fifths) cubed is shown below. 2 (three-fifths) cubed = 2 (StartFraction 3 cubed Over 5 EndFractio
sammy [17]

Answer:

Jim's error is " He did not multiply Three-fifths by 2 before applying the power "

Step-by-step explanation:

Jim's evaluating expression is 2(\frac{3}{5})^3

To verify Jim's error :

Jim's steps are

2(\frac{3}{5})^3

=2(\frac{3^3}{5})

=2(\frac{3\times 3\times 3}{5})

=2(\frac{27}{5})

=\frac{54}{5}

Therefore 2(\frac{3}{5})^3=\frac{54}{5}

Jim's error is " He did not multiply Three-fifths by 2 before applying the power "

That is the corrected steps are

2(\frac{3}{5})^3

=2(\frac{3^3}{5^3})  ( using the property (\frac{a}{b})^m=\frac{a^m}{b^m} )

=2(\frac{3\times 3\times 3}{5\times 5\times 5})

=2(\frac{27}{125})

=\frac{54}{125}

2(\frac{3}{5})^3=\frac{54}{125}

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Find the value of l and b if perimeter is 100 cm​
Daniel [21]

Answer:

I cant help because I dont know the length of one of the sides

Step-by-step explanation:

it would be i+b=100

that's the best I can do

5 0
3 years ago
Nineteen immigrants to the U.S. were asked how many years, to the nearest year, they have lived in the U.S. The data are as foll
JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

a) The frequency of the data "<em>15</em>" and "<em>20</em>" is 2 for both, not 1; this means their relative frequency is 2/19 for both, not 1/19; finally, the cumulative relative frequency in the row of the data "15" should be 0.8947, not 0.8421. This error might have happened because someone didn't count the numbers correctly, so they only noticed one "15" and one "20" when, in fact, there were two people that had lived in the U.S. for 15 years, and two more people for 20 years. On the other hand, the error in the cumulative relative frequency happened because it accounted for only one person living in the U.S. for 15 years, instead of two people.

b) Roughly 47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. from 0 to 5 years, <em>not </em>for 5 years. The cumulative relative frequency in this row (47%) accounts for every data gathered so far, not just the "5 years" row. The correct statement would be that <em>3 out of 19</em>, or 15.8% (relative frequency) of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) First of all, to avoid errors like the one in the problem's table, <em>we should first place the given numbers from least to greatest</em>, so we can construct a new frequency table by ourselves. Let's do just that, and we'll end up with something like this:

0 , 0, 2 , 2, 2, 4, 5, 5, 5, 7, 7, 10, 10, 12, 12 , 15, 15, 20, 20

Now we'll have a much easier time from now on.

2) The second step is to <em>construct the Data and Frequency columns</em>. Just place each unique integer in a new row of the <em>Data </em>column, then count how many times that unique integer was found, and, finally, place that number below the <em>Frequency </em>column (<em>Please refer to the Excel Worksheet provided as an attachment). </em>

Let's do it as follows:

Data     Frequency

0            2

2            3

4            1

5            3

7            2

10           2

12           2

15           2

20          2

<em>Note that we counted "15" and "20" twice! So each one of those rows have a frequency of 2, not 1 as the table presented in the problem suggests. </em>

3) Next, we want to construct the Relative frequency and Cumulative relative frequency columns. For the relative frequency column, <em>we just divide the frequency of each row by the total number of immigrants surveyed, which is 19</em>. For the cumulative relative frequency column, <em>we will get each row's relative frequency, and add the cumulative relative frequency of the row before it</em>. Note that for the first row, the cumulative relative frequency is the same as its relative frequency.

We should get something like this:

Data    Frequency    Relative frequency    Cumulative relative frequency

0            2                   2/19                               0.1053

2            3                   3/19                               0.2632

4            1                    1/19                                0.3158

5            3                   3/19                               0.4737

7            2                   2/19                               0.5789

10           2                   2/19                               0.6842

12           2                   2/19                               0.7895

15           2                   2/19                               0.8947

20          2                   2/19                               1.0000

<em>Note that the relative frequency for both "15" and "20" is 2/19 instead of 1/19! Also, we got a cumulative relative frequency of 0.8947 in the row of "15", instead of 0.8421.</em>

4) a) We have just fixed the error in the table, but we have to <em>explain how someone might have arrived at the incorrect number(s)</em>. The most logical way that someone might have gotten the incorrect frequencies of "15" and "20" is that <em>they didn't count the numbers correctly while building the Frequency column</em>. This could have happened because <em>that person probably didn't order the numbers from least to greatest</em>, as we did in Step 1, which makes it way easier to get the frequency of each data without making a mistake.

5) b) We have now to <em>explain what is wrong with the statement "47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years</em>.

To answer that, we can refer to the relative frequency of the row of the data "5", which tells us that 3 out of 19 (or roughly 15.8%) of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years. <em>Relative frequency is telling us the percentage of people that have lived for </em><em>this </em><em>amount of time.</em>

By contrast, <em>the cumulative relative frequency of this same row tells us that </em>0.4737, or roughly 47%, of the people surveyed have lived for 5 years or less. Cumulative relative frequency accounts for the data presented in its row, <em>plus </em>the data presented in the rows before it.

So the correct statement would be either:

  • 15.8% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years, or
  • Roughly 47% of the people surveyed have lived in the U.S. for 5 years or less.
Download xlsx
7 0
4 years ago
Find the product of z1 and z2, where z1 = 2(cos 80° + i sin 80°) and z2 = 9(cos 110° + i sin 110°)
nekit [7.7K]
ANSWER

z_1 z_2=18( \cos( 190 \degree  )  + i \sin( 190 \degree) )


EXPLANATION

The given complex numbers are;

z_1 = 2( \cos(80 \degree)  + i \sin(80 \degree) )

and


z_2= 9( \cos(110 \degree)  + i \sin(110 \degree) )


Recall the binominal identity for complex numbers in polar form.



z_1 z_2=r_1 r_2( \cos( \theta_1 +\theta_2)  + i \sin(\theta_1 +\theta_2) )



We apply this property to obtain,


z_1 z_2=2 \times 9( \cos( 80 \degree +  110 \degree  )  + i \sin(80 \degree +  110 \degree) )



z_1 z_2=18( \cos( 190 \degree  )  + i \sin( 190 \degree) )

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
From 12 ft to 23 ft? And is it a increase or decrease?
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

Increase

Step-by-step explanation:

If you are going from 12ft to 23ft it is an increase in length

Hope this helps

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ALGEBRA HELP ASAP
    10·1 answer
  • if you can draw a number line that shows the relationship between tons and pounds, what would it look like? Explain
    8·1 answer
  • Comparing irrational numbers.. Please help quick
    10·1 answer
  • Why are prime numbers like life in a way? Explain in detail.
    14·2 answers
  • There are 15 cards, numbered 1 through 15. If you pick a card, what is the probability that you choose an odd number or a two?
    12·1 answer
  • 2. A boy who is 5 feet 6 inches tall casts a shadow that is 8 feet and 3 inches long. What is the measure of the
    13·1 answer
  • A b and c of a right angled are in the ratio 7:18:11
    7·1 answer
  • What is the ratio of ounces of<br> peanuts to ounces of almonds?
    7·1 answer
  • Find the value of x for which l || m.
    9·1 answer
  • 2.(16x + 9y) + (7x -8y) =
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!