How was the Netherlands more democratic than most seventeenth-century European nations

1 answer:

4 0

The Netherlands is more democratic than most seventeenth-century European nations in certain ways. These are:

The country operates a confederacy which gives each state or province a huge level of freedom.

During this period anybody can win the position of the province leader.

This position is known as a stadtholder.

Unlike other European nations at this period that are operating monarchical style of government.

Also, the Netherlands, at this point was using a republic form of government.

Hence, in this case, the Netherlands was more democratic than most seventeenth-century European nations.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/12205775

You might be interested in

What accounts for the success of absolutism in some parts of Europe and its failure

Ghella [55]

Answer:

Because even if the Absolutism has similarities and was applied in almost the entire Europe, each country modeled its conceptions to adapt to reality. And this reality could be social, political or religious.

Explanation:

I believe that the better way to understand this point is analyzing the two major countries where the Absolutism was strong: France and England.

France was ruled by Louis XIV in the 17th century. He describes himself as "The state is me" (“L'Etat c'est Moi”). This monarch is the main definition of the absolutist ruler. To support his government, Louis XIV follows the idea of Divine Right of Kings which argued that the monarch had divine powers and was elected by God. Thus, his actions and laws were divine and couldn't be disrespected. The question is: why this conception worked in France? Because it was a catholic country, and religious perceptions were followed without question. Plus, Louis XIV had no limits in his powers. I mean, there was no law or political scheme that could limit him.
On the contrary, in England, the king was subjected to the Parlament. However, only this restriction was not sufficed to limit his power. The main point is that the British kings followed the idea of a social contract (popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes). This idea attests that a king has duties with its people, and the Parlament was always remembering him about this. So, he couldn't do whatever he wanted.

8 0

3 years ago

Whats the answer for number 12?

IrinaK [193]

The Gibbons v. Odgen was a decision that ruled that Supreme Court could regulate interstate commerce.

8 0

2 years ago

According to this image what do Chinese junk appear to be made out of

Misha Larkins [42]

Wood is the best possible answer

8 0

3 years ago

Which President of the Republic of Texas declared that "the white man and the red

salantis [7]

Answer:

President Mirabeau B. Lamar

Explanation:

Hope this helps...

6 0

3 years ago

How were the Jews liberated from the death camps? PLZ ILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIST

sashaice [31]

On 27 January 1945, Auschwitz concentration camp—a Nazi concentration camp where more than a million people were murdered—was liberated by the Red Army during the Vistula–Oder Offensive. Although most of the prisoners had been forced onto a death march, about 7,000 had been left behind.

3 0

3 years ago