Answer:
Definitions below. V
Explanation:
Foreiture is the loss or giving up of something as a penalty for wrongdoing, something similar to a Confiscation or Sequestration.
The types of Foreiture include but are not limited to:
Criminal forfeiture: An action brought as a part of the criminal prosecution of a defendant. It is an in personam (against the person) action and requires that the government indict the property used or derived from the crime along with the defendant. If the jury finds the property forfeit-able, the court issues an order of forfeiture.
Civil judicial forfeiture: An in rem (against the property) action brought in court against the property. The property is the defendant and no criminal charge against the owner is necessary.
Administrative forfeiture: An in rem action that permits the federal seizing agency to forfeit the property without judicial involvement. The authority for a seizing agency to start an administrative forfeiture action is found in the Tariff Act of 1930. Property that can be administratively forfeited is: merchandise the importation of which is prohibited, a conveyance used to import, transport, or store a controlled substance, a monetary instrument, or other property that does not exceed $500,000 in value.
Answer:
The correct answer is B. Companies improve their productivity using money from investments.
Explanation:
In the capitalist production system, companies require an initial investment of money to be able to produce the goods or services they offer to the market. Thus, this money is used, among other things, for the purchase of inputs, machinery, advertising expenses, etc., aimed at maximizing its returns. Therefore, the more money the company has, the higher its productivity.
Answer:
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case in which the justices ruled unanimously that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional.
Explanation:
please mark this answer as brainliest
Answer: i think it is D but it can be C too
so its one of thos
Explanation:
Answer:
Yes as an investigaiter uderstanding Agathas motive would be important because she coud be getting the water cause she is realy be thirsty or she could be getting it to taget Eric by using the water excuse used to spy on him so hearing her motive would help me put as an investigator.
AS a jury it would be important to hear Agatha´s motive because I can hear why she was trespasing to get the water because she could be dehydrated and need the water. For a jury to hear her story would make to choose the choice of guilty or inicent and alos so she gets a chance to speak for herself then from what a investigator found.
