The correct answer is: The great compromise resolve the dispute between small population states and large population states. The 3/5 compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining the states population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the house of representatives. I would appreciate if you would mark Brainliest if this answer was helpful, thanks!
Answer:
During the exposition of a story, the author describes a character as so shy, they would rather have their teeth pulled out at the dentist than to present a speech to an audience. What is this called?
Explanation:
There is no penalty for wrong answers on grid-in questions, so you should grid in anything that ... Sometimes sentence completion questions contain two blanks rather than one. In ... If you have already taken an SAT, use your actual scores from that test. • If you ... audience will be in no ---- about the meaning of the speech.
The role Stare decisis role in weberry v Sanders decision is that it help the court to rule using the existing Constitution. The court had to follow it doctrine.
<h3>Stare Decisis role</h3>
Stare decisis refers to Court's doctrine which is taking into consideration before making their decisions. Stare decisis means “to stand by things
In 1963, James P. Wesberry lived in a Georgia congressional district which had higher population than thecongressional districts in the state. He said that is vote did not count and is not rendered value d because there was only one member of
Congress for each congressional district because the state failed to adjust.
For the congressional districts to meet the changing population. Wesberry sought for ways inorder to prevent Georgia government from conducting elections under the current form of district system. The district court dismissed his complaint, He then appealed to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court opinion and vadity was that congressional districts must have almost equal populations compare to each other. The court further held that the state apportionment statute was invalid because it did not follow the Constitution.
Therefore, The role Stare decisis role in weberry v Sanders decision is that it help the court to rule using the existing Constitution. The court had to follow it doctrine.
Learn more about stare Decisis from.the link below.
brainly.com/question/1673584
I think A am pretty sure am right
