The answer would be A. Have the Defendant pay a higher bail amount... Judges I don't believe can take away a person right of bail because of the "innocent until proven Guilty". They won't have the defendant followed by the police 24/7 but they may have them monitored. And judges CANNOT take away a person right to a trial.
<span>Since the decision of the
Speaker of the House, John William McCormack, was to ask the high
chamber member Adam Clayton Powell Jr. not to take an oath, because of
the previous scandal in which Powell had been involved; If
the jury had decided in favor of Speaker McCormack, the way of operating
in the congress would have been questioned, since only one member could
be expelled according to what the constitution says, and not by the
decisions of the speaker. <span>The scope would have been very
large if it failed in McCormack's favor, giving a sense of illegality or
favoritism, and voters would feel that their representatives were not
respected.</span></span>
Answer:
I'm pretty sure A would be the proper answer.
Answer:
Realmente no entiendo la pregunta pero ...
Hubo muchas razones a largo y corto plazo para explicar por qué Estados Unidos se involucró en Vietnam a fines de la década de 1950.
..
1 razón: independencia vietnamita
2da razón- Guerra civil
Tercera razón: la teoría del dominó
Cuarta razón: el débil gobierno de Vietnam del Sur
Quinta razón: el incidente del golfo de Tonkin de 1964
Answer:
French activities did not require slave labor.
Explanation:
