1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mamaluj [8]
3 years ago
11

Hewo there meh friends hero pwease ansan

Mathematics
2 answers:
AVprozaik [17]3 years ago
5 0
So there’s no actual question because you didn’t attach anything
hoa [83]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

excuse me !! where is the question... without question .?? how to answer?

You might be interested in
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
Fuel x costs $2 per gallon and fuel y costs $3 per gallon. You have at most $18 to spend on fuel. Write a system of linear inequ
Sloan [31]

The answer is :

x + y ≤ 14

2x + 3y ≤ 18

3 0
3 years ago
Solve x2=22. Use a radical sign in each answer<br><br> x=? and x=?
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

x=sqrt{22}

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Please help me - thankyou :)
olga_2 [115]
It is 6 because 1000 would not be the appropiate answer 
3 0
3 years ago
The range of the following relation R {(3, −2), (1, 2), (−1, −4), (−1, 2)}
Oxana [17]
I think the rang numbers are -2 , 2 , -4 , and 2. i hope that correct.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Solve for a. <br> a+(−7)=−17 What is the answer
    11·2 answers
  • Find the Volume of the following shape.
    7·1 answer
  • 50:33
    6·2 answers
  • Find the quotient. 2y/5x / y/6x
    5·2 answers
  • At 6: 00 a.m., Buffalo, NY had a temperature of 10℉. At noon, the temperature was −10℉, and at midnight it was −20℉.
    13·1 answer
  • What is 5(4x-5y)-2=453
    11·1 answer
  • What are the coordinates?? please help!!
    9·1 answer
  • What is the value of n in the equation below? a^n/ a^3 = a^9 <br>a. 3 <br>b. 6 <br>c. 12 <br>d. 27​
    12·1 answer
  • Estimate how far he ran in 4 seconds. and Is Kiran's time a function of the distance he has run?
    12·1 answer
  • Evaluate (−3a + 4b)32c − 1 when a = 4, b = 2, and c = 3. <br> Plz Help Its a quiz
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!