Great mineral wealth provided the impetus for the transformation of Etruscan society in the orientalizing period.
How was the orientalizing period developed?
- The Orientalizing period or Orientalizing revolution (also spelled "Orientalising") in the Archaic phase of ancient Greek art is the cultural and art historical period that started in the latter part of the 8th century BC.
- When there was a significant influence from the more developed art of the Eastern Mediterranean and the Ancient Near East. The primary sources were Egypt, Phoenicia, Syria, and Assyria.
- During this time, ornamental motifs and a fascination with animals and monsters emerged in ancient Greek art, which later transferred to Roman and Etruscan art.
- The development of Etruscan society during the orientalizing period was sparked by a significant mineral richness.
To learn more about Etruscan refer to:
brainly.com/question/6758158
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Mayflower Compact was needed to institute a government with just and equal laws.
Hope this helps, if not let me know.
False. Family does not perpetuate social inequality in the structural-functional approach. This is because this theory believes that all human interactions are related to how society functions. How a person's specific inclinations are based on values and morals he/she has shared bonds with in his immediate circle.
Professor Henry works in the area of "<span>social cognition".</span>
Social cognition is a sub-subject of
social psychology that spotlights on how individuals process, store, and apply
data about other individuals and social circumstances. It emphasizes on the
part that cognitive procedures play in social associations. To be more technical,
social cognition alludes to how
individuals deal individuals from similar species or even crosswise over
species.
Answer:
Neuroticism
Explanation:
In five-factor model of personality, neuroticism measures how easy a person experience negative feeling that increase their overall stress level. People that are high in neuriticsm tend to be seen as 'unfavorable' for leadership positions since their emotion will become a hindrance in their critical thinking process.
